| Author |
Message |
| Topic: ONLINE CHAT WITH RSI CHAT TRANSCRIPT |
Obregon
Replies: 111
Views: 69935
|
 Forum: General Discussion
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 6:06 am Subject: ONLINE CHAT WITH RSI CHAT TRANSCRIPT |
| Speaking as a novice AD player, I can say the biggest disappointment for me is that some styles have NO SHOT in the upper game. I suppose that's semi-fair when talking about styles that shine early ( ... |
| Topic: 15-9-3-9-13-12-9 |
Obregon
Replies: 11
Views: 9711
|
Forum: Roll-Up Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:47 am Subject: 15-9-3-9-13-12-9 |
I like this warrior in the arena, but this is not a tourney warrior for me. After getting spanked in the Fall mailer, I sent just three to the FtF and had better results, going .500.
This guy wou ... |
| Topic: How well would you have done in tourneys with this warrior? |
Obregon
Replies: 36
Views: 28281
|
Forum: General Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:54 am Subject: How well would you have done in tourneys with this warrior? |
The problem here is the little damage. Any issues you have with a Lunger/TP having little damage, is only going to be magnified by choosing an off-style (such as PL) for this roll-up.
In general, ... |
| Topic: How well would you have done in tourneys with this warrior? |
Obregon
Replies: 36
Views: 28281
|
Forum: General Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:28 am Subject: How well would you have done in tourneys with this warrior? |
Ah, but as a Lunger, this warrior is defensive!
A defensive that burns endurance as fast or faster than any other style ... and who has favorite rhythms likely to be high ... and who can't damage h ... |
| Topic: How well would you have done in tourneys with this warrior? |
Obregon
Replies: 36
Views: 28281
|
Forum: General Discussion
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:22 pm Subject: How well would you have done in tourneys with this warrior? |
| I see no problem with taking a chance on little damage. If you get normal hoorah! If not then it is a project and one worth executing. While some people can do with the advice that there are styles ot ... |
| Topic: Scimitar Hate |
Obregon
Replies: 53
Views: 35900
|
Forum: General Discussion
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:45 pm Subject: Scimitar Hate |
Obregon just challenged me and destroyed me with a scimitar.  Damn subterfuge. I knew I should have used ASM in my if challenged strategy. 
Thank you for the shout-out. Regarding the warrio ... |
| Topic: How well would you have done in tourneys with this warrior? |
Obregon
Replies: 36
Views: 28281
|
Forum: General Discussion
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm Subject: How well would you have done in tourneys with this warrior? |
| In my humble opinion, this is yet another example of shoehorning a good but mismatched rollup into one of the offensive "power styles" when better results could have been had with a (gasp!) defensive ... |
| Topic: Scimitar Hate |
Obregon
Replies: 53
Views: 35900
|
Forum: General Discussion
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:25 pm Subject: Scimitar Hate |
3) Last point to clear up: If it offers so much, why would anyone (other than a basher) use anything else? 
And to be honest, I can't think of a lot of good reasons for bashers not to use it, t ... |
| Topic: 3 to chew on |
Obregon
Replies: 8
Views: 8359
|
Forum: Roll-Up Discussion
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:43 am Subject: 3 to chew on |
| 6-13-7-12-12-4-16 presents many favorable options. If you go for the trip-17, you're looking at 9-13-7-17-17-4-17, which would make a wonderful parry-x warrior. With normal/good endurance, I would p ... |
| Topic: Scimitar Hate |
Obregon
Replies: 53
Views: 35900
|
Forum: General Discussion
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:26 am Subject: Scimitar Hate |
Obregon just challenged me and destroyed me with a scimitar. Damn subterfuge. I knew I should have used ASM in my if challenged strategy.
Thank you for the shout-out. Regarding the warrio ... |
| Topic: A few to pass the time |
Obregon
Replies: 6
Views: 6330
|
Forum: Roll-Up Discussion
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:04 pm Subject: Re: A few to pass the time |
This is arena team but the warriors there are also tourney warriors if possible.
4-10-14-19-8-5-10
Was thinking: 7-15-14-21-9-5-13 PS I would do 9-13-14-21-9-5-13 here
9-5-14-12-4-13-13
Was ... |
| Topic: Sunset - Turn 656 |
Obregon
Replies: 33
Views: 22711
|
Forum: Delarquian Issues
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:03 pm Subject: Sunset - Turn 656 |
Salamander: 6-3-17-17-15-9-17 AB
He was very effective against TPs. Yes, he was an experiment back in the day (WAY back). |
| Topic: Results Link |
Obregon
Replies: 56
Views: 32972
|
Forum: Tourney Chat
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:13 pm Subject: Results Link |
| Thanks to Matt/Daemonspawn for running my rookies in the FTF. Starting small in my tourney pipeline (I only sent 3 warriors), I/we managed a 9-9-1 collective record. Looking forward to future tourne ... |
| Topic: 10-10-14-11-11-4-10 |
Obregon
Replies: 7
Views: 6931
|
Forum: Roll-Up Discussion
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:45 pm Subject: 10-10-14-11-11-4-10 |
| I have a lunger that is very close to those stats (within one or two points) and he has a 60% winning record. You have to commit to a balanced strategy though, as his decisiveness is nothing to write ... |
| Topic: 9-9-5-13-13-11-10 |
Obregon
Replies: 12
Views: 10498
|
Forum: Roll-Up Discussion
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:19 pm Subject: 9-9-5-13-13-11-10 |
| As a PL, I would go 10-10-5-17-17-12-13, training ST and CN once each. You should end up with normal damage, HP and carry, along with a shot at good endurance. This particular PL is very decisive, s ... |
| |
