6-16-14-9-12-3-10--maybe a scum
7-7-12-9-10-13-12--DA?
9-4-17-8-13-13-6--Another DA?
10-10-10-12-5-9-14--Workable
9-13-10-13-5-10-10--Hmm...Piker?
9-13-12-12-4-13-7--OMG, if you could have only see the god he replaced
15-4-11-13-8-10-9--My favorite on the list
I just wanted to post these to see if there is something here I may have missed.
Polarius
_________________ "...no one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave..."
- George W. Bush
"Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names."
- John F. Kennedy
Joined: Mar 30, 2003
Posts: 850
Location: Saginaw, Michigan
Posted:
Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:08 am
Not telling you anything you don't know I am sure, but hoping it will spark some conversation...
On warriors like these, who are only destined to be tourney guys, I will make them so they have small chances at greatness that are easy to see.
I will make physicals so that they have a 5% or less chance in each area to come out great. For example: 45% normal, 50% good, 5% great. I will hope that these middle of the road guys will come back blessed in both areas, as these are easy to see.
I will also roll them up to look for obvious bonusses. As an example, guys with starting 12 att, def, or decise are easy to identlify as +4 if they are expert on overview. Other breakpoints work as well.
I am hoping this sparks a converstion of what others do with their tourney RU's that are just fodder on team RU's.
I currently have a 11/15 AB who is looking to be at least +12 from doing stuff like this. Now, just to see if that defense is +4 as well, and the long trek to sandbagging challengers and ADM is on.
-Detective Kellumbo
Polarius wrote:
6-16-14-9-12-3-10--maybe a scum
7-7-12-9-10-13-12--DA?
9-4-17-8-13-13-6--Another DA?
10-10-10-12-5-9-14--Workable
9-13-10-13-5-10-10--Hmm...Piker?
9-13-12-12-4-13-7--OMG, if you could have only see the god he replaced
15-4-11-13-8-10-9--My favorite on the list
I just wanted to post these to see if there is something here I may have missed.
Not telling you anything you don't know I am sure, but hoping it will spark some conversation...
On warriors like these, who are only destined to be tourney guys, I will make them so they have small chances at greatness that are easy to see.
I will make physicals so that they have a 5% or less chance in each area to come out great. For example: 45% normal, 50% good, 5% great. I will hope that these middle of the road guys will come back blessed in both areas, as these are easy to see.
I will also roll them up to look for obvious bonusses. As an example, guys with starting 12 att, def, or decise are easy to identlify as +4 if they are expert on overview. Other breakpoints work as well.
I am hoping this sparks a converstion of what others do with their tourney RU's that are just fodder on team RU's.
I currently have a 11/15 AB who is looking to be at least +12 from doing stuff like this. Now, just to see if that defense is +4 as well, and the long trek to sandbagging challengers and ADM is on.
-Detective Kellumbo
Polarius wrote:
Polarius
I do this all the time. I think this is a highly beneficial/economical way to judge warriors. The only problm is it leads to things like having to run 11/15 ABs! (or in my case 8 will lungers...)
Well stated, Detective!
Don/TUM
Polarius Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 867
Location: Alabama
Posted:
Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:19 am
I agree this is a good tactic. I've found some blessed warriors by doing this. (Of course some I still cringe when I consider running them!) So, what would you do with these?
Polarius
_________________ "...no one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave..."
- George W. Bush
"Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names."
- John F. Kennedy
To be honest, I probably wouldn't run any of them. But th at doesn't mean they aren't runnable. I just might be the wrong person to evaluate them.
Don/TUM
Polarius Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 867
Location: Alabama
Posted:
Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:43 am
TUM wrote:
Polarius wrote:
So, what would you do with these?
Polarius
To be honest, I probably wouldn't run any of them. But th at doesn't mean they aren't runnable. I just might be the wrong person to evaluate them.
Don/TUM
Oh, I agree that they aren't prime tourney candidates. I really only like one or two for arena play. I just wondered if someone saw something (a design maybe....) that I didn't see.
Polarius
_________________ "...no one is fit to be a master and no one deserves to be a slave..."
- George W. Bush
"Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names."
- John F. Kennedy
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
Posts: 1018
Location: Kelowna, BC CAN
Posted:
Thu Apr 14, 2005 4:32 pm
>7-7-12-9-10-13-12--DA?
No! Not right away anyway, if it was mine I'd try:
9-7-12-15-15-13-13 SL,ST,PS or 8-7-12-15-16-13-13 burner with same styles.
I would try a couple turns to see how he does but I have very good luck with 15 WT warriors.
_________________ Maximillian
"Only the dead have seen the end of war."- Plato
Northern Badlands
Canada eh!
Oh Those Romans
Rednecks
Natural B. Killers
What Gaul!
Isn't it Obvious
Caress of Steel
Vicious Vamps
Stik ArchMaster Poster
Joined: May 06, 2003
Posts: 2514
Location: Frozen Tundra of North Dakota
Posted:
Fri Apr 15, 2005 8:18 am
Polarius wrote:
6-16-14-9-12-3-10--maybe a scum
7-7-12-9-10-13-12--DA?
9-4-17-8-13-13-6--Another DA?
10-10-10-12-5-9-14--Workable
9-13-10-13-5-10-10--Hmm...Piker?
9-13-12-12-4-13-7--OMG, if you could have only see the god he replaced
15-4-11-13-8-10-9--My favorite on the list
I just wanted to post these to see if there is something here I may have missed.
Polarius
9-7-12-15-15-13-13 SL/LU/ST/PS, even PR, I definitely wouldn't DA it right off, could be pretty sweet. Guys like this come back bonused often.
11-4-17-11-17-13-11 BA/SL/LU, use QS as a BA, look for bonuses and trem. damage, could get lucky!
11-11-10-17-9-9-17 PR
10-13-10-17-9-10-15 PR/PS/ST
9-13-12-17-9-13-11 ST/PS, DA if not nicely bonused
17-4-11-17-14-10-11 BA, pray for +5 att!
I wouldn't automatically DA any of these guys, but the first one's the only one that catches my eye.
6-16-14-9-12-3-10--maybe a scum
7-7-12-9-10-13-12--DA?
9-4-17-8-13-13-6--Another DA?
10-10-10-12-5-9-14--Workable
9-13-10-13-5-10-10--Hmm...Piker?
9-13-12-12-4-13-7--OMG, if you could have only see the god he replaced
15-4-11-13-8-10-9--My favorite on the list
I just wanted to post these to see if there is something here I may have missed.
Polarius
I like Kellumbo's idea, but you also miss out on alot of +3 type guys (or +4 especially in defense) doing that. I guess it's according if it's a tourney team or a team you really like to play. Anyway, here's my thoughts....if a tourney team:
7-7-12-9-10-13-12--DA?
9-7-12-15-17-13-13 SL or 9-7-12-15-10-14-17 PS
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
