No ST or LU, huh? I guess the first numbers that pop to my mind are the following....
16-10-7-9-10-8-10 --> 17-10-7-15-16-8-11 Guess this could be a lot of things, but if ST & LU are out, I guess I'd go BA. Burn WL then just train skills after that. I still think this would make an excellent LU though (which is what I'd likely do if it were mine).
_________________ We don't get mad, we get even!
Vanek, Manager of the Warmasters (DM-81)
One Armed Bandit ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Apr 15, 2004
Posts: 2960
Posted:
Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:16 pm
I would probably make it:
21-10-7-15-10-10-11 BA or SL
With a bit of luck, he'll end up with normal endurance and great damage. He's a bit slow off the starting block, but when he gets to attack, it should be a good one. Challenge slower warriors and he'll do just fine.
The Consortium ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 10146
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting
Posted:
Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:52 am
drdaddy wrote:
16-10-7-9-10-8-10 Ideas anyone? Many thanks!
No LU/ST?
18-16-7-9-16-8-10 TP burner
17-10-7-15-15-9-11 BA
_________________ The Consortium: Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014; 1213 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 176K+ fights and 118K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @2085; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1976; Lenpros DM30 @ 1792; Fandils DM46 @1727
nuln Advanced Master Poster
Joined: Aug 21, 2005
Posts: 423
Location: the chaos plains to the north
Posted:
Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:57 am
Terminator wrote:
No ST or LU, huh? I guess the first numbers that pop to my mind are the following....
16-10-7-9-10-8-10 --> 17-10-7-15-16-8-11 Guess this could be a lot of things, but if ST & LU are out, I guess I'd go BA. Burn WL then just train skills after that. I still think this would make an excellent LU though (which is what I'd likely do if it were mine).
With your caveat, I might try the same #'s as Term, and go with WoS. Burn your will and con, stick him in plate or thereabouts, and hope he learns well. Could be a good arena warrior, and with some luck good in tourney's too.
_________________ 32, 47, 60, 81, and a kajillion in 82
Darque ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 21, 2002
Posts: 2528
Location: Virginia
Posted:
Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:14 pm
drdaddy wrote:
16-10-7-9-10-8-10 Ideas anyone? Many thanks!
So that would leave SL, BA, and AB. My choice would depend more on the arena and what I already had on the team. But here are my options for all three styles:
16-10-7-10-16-9-16 AB and train WL, WT, ST, SP, DF x1. I've been running a lot of low wit ABs here lately and I am astounded at how well they learn with the low wit and their performance thus far is well above expectations.
17-10-7-15-16-8-11 SL and train WL x1. Would like more SPD, but this is very workable. YOu don't even have to bump the WL if he comes back bonused and you want to save the skills for a boost later.
21-10-7-15-10-8-13 BA and no trains needed. Least appealing of them all to me, but still workable. Could even opt for the 17 ST and go for more WILL, DFT, or SPD. I like the 21 STR for some reason.
Last edited by Darque on Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
JGW ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Sep 05, 2005
Posts: 1316
Posted:
Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:29 pm
Darque wrote:
16-10-7-10-16-8-17 AB and train WL, WT, ST x1. I've been running a lot of low wit ABs here lately and I am astounded at how well they learn with the low wit and their performance thus far is well above expectations.
I'm sure the Darque one meant to have a 16 deftness and train it up to 17, or maybe leave it at 16.
I think the baby is introducing the 'old man' disease to him, but he wouldn't be the only D2 manager suffering from it. Right Consortium?
_________________ The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty. -- John Adams
It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees. -- Midnight Oil, The Power and the Passion
Darque ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 21, 2002
Posts: 2528
Location: Virginia
Posted:
Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:54 pm
I corrected it. I think I was tinkering with numbers and decided that 17 starting deft was better than 16 because of the double attack skills, but I didn't bother to notice that it only started at 10, so 17 was impossible and then it got weird.....
anyways, I'll chalk it up to my new narcotic for my bad back. I had just popped two of them and then decided to type out a response...i'll know better next time.
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 10146
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting
Posted:
Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:19 am
JGW wrote:
Darque wrote:
16-10-7-10-16-8-17 AB and train WL, WT, ST x1. I've been running a lot of low wit ABs here lately and I am astounded at how well they learn with the low wit and their performance thus far is well above expectations.
I'm sure the Darque one meant to have a 16 deftness and train it up to 17, or maybe leave it at 16.
I think the baby is introducing the 'old man' disease to him, but he wouldn't be the only D2 manager suffering from it. Right Consortium?
We are not sure we understood the inference?
Darque, we understood!
_________________ The Consortium: Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014; 1213 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 176K+ fights and 118K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @2085; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1976; Lenpros DM30 @ 1792; Fandils DM46 @1727
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
