Duel2.Com  
•   Home  •  Rules  •  Your Account  •  Forums  • Newsletters  •
Navigate
· Home
· Content
· Encyclopedia
· Forums
· Members List
· Newsletters
· Old Newsletters
· Private Messages
· Setup
· Tourneys
· Your Account
User Info
Welcome, Anonymous
Nickname
Password
(Register)
Membership:
Latest: yqofakyso
New Today: 2
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 104513

People Online:
Visitors:
Members:
Total: 0
Duel2.Com: Forums

Duel2 :: View topic - 12-10-10-10-11-13-4
 Forum FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in

 
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
trmweb
Expert Poster
Expert Poster


Joined: Dec 05, 2012
Posts: 82
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:30 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

I'm a little stumped on this one ...

One thought is 12-10-10-15-15-13-9 SL (or ST or LU) ...
It just seems a little "average" ...

Appreciate any suggestions.

Thanks,
Trim
----------------------------------------------------
Mgr of SOUND (15) in Murska Arena (DM-35)
View user's profileSend private message
Terminator
ArchMaster Poster
ArchMaster Poster


Joined: Jul 18, 2006
Posts: 1170

PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:37 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

I'd make this a burner.....12-10-10-16-17-13-6 and burn it to a 13-10-10-17-17-14-7 ST.

_________________
We don't get mad, we get even!

Vanek, Manager of the Warmasters (DM-81)
View user's profileSend private message
Street_Legal
ArchMaster Poster
ArchMaster Poster


Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Posts: 3559
Location: The Big D (etroit) area

PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:27 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Warriors who are lacking in DF/WT/WL must be looked at in a sense of choosing a style to minimize that deficiency's effect/affect. Low WL can be diminished in effect by using a low endurance burn style and/or a style that doesn't depend on taking a certain amount of damage and still managing to win. Low WT can be minimized by defensive styles or styles less dependent on skill level. Low DF can be minimized by high ATT styles, or again styles less dependent on skill levels.

This guy is not severely deficient in ATT, despite the low DF, because it has pretty high WT and WL. To me I'd look at styles who have a fairly decent selection of low DF weapons and is probably not a defensive style because I'd like to maximize the high-ish SP. I'd be thinking about LU/SL/BA. I might think ST but the style has a low ATT base and too many points in CN versus DF. In general you tend to want something along the, skill bases from said stats, lines of 17 WT, 9 WL, 11 DF minimum for a ST, as a general rule in my book; or again any combination of ATT skills that equal the 15 ATT skills that comefrom those stat numbers. PS does not have to do so due to it's defensive capabilities if the build is right.


12-10-10-10-11-13-4 -----> 12-10-10-15-17-13-7 LU/SL

12-10-10-10-11-13-4 -----> 14-10-10-15-17-13-5 BA

I also like Terminator's burn idea but as another possibility for a burner consider this:

12-10-10-10-11-13-4 -----> 12-10-10-15-15-13-9 LU/SL/PL/BA/PS/ST burnt to 13-10-10-17-17-13-11. If going LU or PL could also go to SP of 15 at some point for DEF,DEC,RIP,and INI skills along the way.

If I burn I would generally like to take any single point from one area, in Terminator's example WT and 2 points of WL, and put them into DF taking it into the range of burning it to the ever important 11 DF mark. By doing so I still keep WT and WL burnable to 17 with 2 trains each. It's a bit more stat training intensive but I think it'll better balance the warrior and it gives you alot more weapons to choose from.

With the examples with more than 1 style listed I listed them in order of my preference for this particular warrior. By no means does it mean the best choice, in general.

_________________
A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

Thomas Jefferson
View user's profileSend private message
The Consortium
ArchMaster Poster
ArchMaster Poster


Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 10136
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting

PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:27 am Reply with quoteBack to top

This becomes either a
13-10-10-15-17-14-5 BA
or a
12-10-10-15-17-13-7 SL

_________________
The Consortium: Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014; 1213 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 176K+ fights and 118K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @2085; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1976; Lenpros DM30 @ 1792; Fandils DM46 @1727
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
_Buri_
ArchMaster Poster
ArchMaster Poster


Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Posts: 1040
Location: Asgard

PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:52 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

I would simply DA it. It looks similar to my 3 replacement rollups from the tourney, none of which will ever see the light of day.

_________________
Buri, Crapmaster 2012, Crapgiver 2017
Aesir 003 & 100 & 102, ACME 009, Berk 025, Venture Bros 051 etc.
View user's profileSend private message
gentleben
ArchMaster Poster
ArchMaster Poster


Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Round Rock, Tx

PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:02 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

_Buri_ wrote:
I would simply DA it. It looks similar to my 3 replacement rollups from the tourney, none of which will ever see the light of day.


Spoken like a jaded tourney manager Rolling Eyes


Wink

12-10-10-10-11-13-4-->12-10-10-15-17-13-7 SL/LU/BA probably in that order

_________________
Gentleben
Ben's Bazaar-21
Caress of Steel-28
Secret Squirrels-32
He Be GBs-33
Time Stallyans-45
Pawn of Prophecy-47
Primal Instinct-81
Misfit Managers-1,2,3,4,18,25,29
View user's profileSend private message
trmweb
Expert Poster
Expert Poster


Joined: Dec 05, 2012
Posts: 82
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:13 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Quote:
12-10-10-10-11-13-4-->12-10-10-15-17-13-7 SL/LU/BA probably in that order

I'm going with the above as a Slasher.

Appreciate all the feedback! Especially Street Legal's analytical approach. I've gotta keep that handy for future reference.

Trim
View user's profileSend private message
Street_Legal
ArchMaster Poster
ArchMaster Poster


Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Posts: 3559
Location: The Big D (etroit) area

PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:07 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

trmweb wrote:
Quote:
12-10-10-10-11-13-4-->12-10-10-15-17-13-7 SL/LU/BA probably in that order

I'm going with the above as a Slasher.

Appreciate all the feedback! Especially Street Legal's analytical approach. I've gotta keep that handy for future reference.

Trim


No problem at all. I may not be a tourney, or even a basic design, expert but I think I've designed enough to offer some tips to new and returning managers to help them help themselves a bit. Plus I've read and talked with enough good managers to add what I've gained from them.

I've found that looking at warrior design style by style, as they come along, seems to eliminate some of the confusion and clutter from thought process and shock of "What the hell do I do with this..." By eliminating 4-5 styles right off the bat you only have to design it for a few styles and then look at which makes the most sense compared to your experience and knowledge.

If some of my advice can help us keep managers around, and ease frustration, then all the better .... Even at the expense of some wins!

_________________
A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

Thomas Jefferson
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.10 © 2001 phpBB Group

Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©
:: fisubsilver shadow phpbb2 style by Daz :: PHP-Nuke theme by coldblooded (www.nukemods.com) ::