Since this was the first thought out of my head it is automatically suspect. I also considered 11-10-7-21-11-9-15 PR/AB? but don't feel comfortable with the low WL.
Also, running 11-10-7-17-17-9-13 PL/PS/SL is a possibility, but I hate to turn my back on a genius, even though the last two that I've had have averaged only 1.6 skills per turn (or less).
Thoughts?
_________________ "Don't make me destroy you." -- Darth Vader
Tripwire ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 1999
Posted:
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:40 am
6-10-7-17-11-9-10
Tourney warrior: 9-10-7-21-17-9-11 ST
Do not make this into a AB. I also wouldn't make this a parry anything due to the low parry skills. The ST above is probably the only thing I make this warrior even in the regular arena.
Normal End and Damage takes away the endurance styles like LU, SL, WS etc. Low Parry takes away the parry styles TP, PR, PL, PS, WS. Not having a 21 DF (or even 17) takes away AB. Not enough STR for basher weapons. And that leaves ST. Low endurance ok, able to carry SC, decisiveness is 11 starting and 9 attack which are both fine starting skills for ST.
Later on 11/12 ST/CN combo gives it good endurance. Once maxed in DEC you can bump the 9 sp to a 10 for another point and once maxed in att/dec you can bump the DF as well.
Since this was the first thought out of my head it is automatically suspect. I also considered 11-10-7-21-11-9-15 PR/AB? but don't feel comfortable with the low WL.
Also, running 11-10-7-17-17-9-13 PL/PS/SL is a possibility, but I hate to turn my back on a genius, even though the last two that I've had have averaged only 1.6 skills per turn (or less).
Thoughts? :)
_________________ Active Arenas: Of Wolf and Man - DM 18, DM 81
Alliance: The Iron Council
gentleben ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Posts: 4025
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posted:
Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:21 am
Tripwire wrote:
6-10-7-17-11-9-10
Tourney warrior: 9-10-7-21-17-9-11 ST
Do not make this into a AB. I also wouldn't make this a parry anything due to the low parry skills. The ST above is probably the only thing I make this warrior even in the regular arena.
Normal End and Damage takes away the endurance styles like LU, SL, WS etc. Low Parry takes away the parry styles TP, PR, PL, PS, WS. Not having a 21 DF (or even 17) takes away AB. Not enough STR for basher weapons. And that leaves ST. Low endurance ok, able to carry SC, decisiveness is 11 starting and 9 attack which are both fine starting skills for ST.
Later on 11/12 ST/CN combo gives it good endurance. Once maxed in DEC you can bump the 9 sp to a 10 for another point and once maxed in att/dec you can bump the DF as well.
Since this was the first thought out of my head it is automatically suspect. I also considered 11-10-7-21-11-9-15 PR/AB? but don't feel comfortable with the low WL.
Also, running 11-10-7-17-17-9-13 PL/PS/SL is a possibility, but I hate to turn my back on a genius, even though the last two that I've had have averaged only 1.6 skills per turn (or less).
Thoughts?
I find Trips logic sound. I would still probably make it a LU but I'm a gluten for punishment
_________________ Gentleben
Ben's Bazaar-21
Caress of Steel-28
Secret Squirrels-32
He Be GBs-33
Time Stallyans-45
Pawn of Prophecy-47
Primal Instinct-81
Misfit Managers-1,2,3,4,18,25,29
The Consortium ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 10187
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting
Since this was the first thought out of my head it is automatically suspect. I also considered 11-10-7-21-11-9-15 PR/AB? but don't feel comfortable with the low WL.
Also, running 11-10-7-17-17-9-13 PL/PS/SL is a possibility, but I hate to turn my back on a genius, even though the last two that I've had have averaged only 1.6 skills per turn (or less).
Thoughts?
9-10-7-21-17-9-11 offensive is prob the best bet (as Trip stated) we probably try a SL in hopes for the more optimal damage roll - SL/ST
have some inklings to go 11-10-7-21-15-9-11 also - again offensive - LU/SL/ST
_________________ The Consortium: Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014; 1213 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 176K+ fights and 118K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @2085; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1976; Lenpros DM30 @ 1792; Fandils DM46 @1727
Stillgard Advanced Expert Poster
Joined: Aug 29, 2003
Posts: 117
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posted:
Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:39 am
I would also go with 9-10-7-21-17-9-11. Probably SL for me.
_________________ Stillgard
The Taken - Lapur, Runeblades - Jade Mountain, Soul Warriors - Cliffhome, Hero Alliance - Murska, Wheel Of Time - Lyratlian, Neverborn - Iaye, Red Fury - Zukal, Rogues Den - Shadowspire
Otto_X Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Jan 09, 2003
Posts: 721
Location: Moline, IL
Posted:
Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:20 pm
The 21 wit should be automatic. The 17 will should be nearly automatic unless there's a compelling reason not to. So,
9-10-7-21-17-9-11 ST/SL/LU/PS.
If you really want more physicals, 11-10-7-21-15-9-11, same styles.
_________________ Homestar & Co (3), Technology (5), Order (14, 36), Ottobahn (31), Ottoman Empire (32), Bad Bread (33), Ottodrome (47, 84, 85), Otto's Diner (81), Rock Ridge (84, 85), et al.
KidArcane Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Apr 26, 2003
Posts: 674
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posted:
Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:11 pm
Good points to consider. The only sticking point for me is that 9 ST coupled with the 7 size. Also, I had PS stuck in my mind, for some reason, and this seemed like a good rollup for it. But really, the speed IS a little high and well --- there are other, more appealing options.
Thanks for the input.
_________________ "Don't make me destroy you." -- Darth Vader
Tripwire ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 1999
Posted:
Mon Jun 03, 2013 1:24 pm
9-9-5-21-17-10-13, Good/Normal Damage
That is Caleb, 2 time Striker TC, Mode Dec
9-4-11-21-17-7-15, Norm/Good
Galeb Duhr, 2 time striker TC
10-10-7-21-17-8-11. Norm/Norm
Crisis, 1 time striker TC
10-6-9-21-17-8-13, Good/Norm
Spikebrook, 1 time striker TC
Low Str doesn't equal bad warrior depending on the style. Normal Damage is more than fine. Trust me when I say when people saw those names (especially Galeb Duhr and Caleb) the didn't want to fight them, lots of kills.
21-17 has been good to me for TC's with strikers, even with low Speed
I have had a few others that were 21 wt, lower wl, but most of them died. My 21-17's survived
Just something to consider.
_________________ Active Arenas: Of Wolf and Man - DM 18, DM 81
Alliance: The Iron Council
trmweb Expert Poster
Joined: Dec 05, 2012
Posts: 82
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posted:
Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:38 pm
Otto_X wrote:
The 21 wit should be automatic. The 17 will should be nearly automatic unless there's a compelling reason not to. So,
9-10-7-21-17-9-11 ST/SL/LU/PS.
This was my RU choice and my first thought was PS (mainly because I don't have a good one right now). But after reading all Tripwire's TC warriors, I might try the ST route.
Good luck on this guy, and hope the RUGs are favorable!
Trim
Assurnasirbanipal ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 1782
Location: San Jose, CA
Posted:
Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:40 am
My own inclination would be the
11-10-7-21-15-9-11
design, but after reading Tripwire's TC list, perhaps I'm more likely to go with the 17 will design. Impressive list, Tripwire!
Tripwire ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 1999
Posted:
Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:42 pm
Assurnasirbanipal wrote:
My own inclination would be the
11-10-7-21-15-9-11
design, but after reading Tripwire's TC list, perhaps I'm more likely to go with the 17 will design. Impressive list, Tripwire!
Trust me being at the face and luck has a lot to do with it also lol.
_________________ Active Arenas: Of Wolf and Man - DM 18, DM 81
Alliance: The Iron Council
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum