BETWEEN 9 and 10

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:00 pm

It appears that YOURBAGD has romped at The Face
ROOK TC (Managerr)
ADEP TV (Grimm)
ADEP TV (Master Darque)

These 100 points would give YOURBAGD an appx 27 point lead going into the last round 10.

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:11 pm

Nice try. You conveniently overlooked:

MOTHER MAYI 47-6966 OLD HABITS (3 Cool

NORTH FORK

I almost killed it, but failed. Sad

Either way, Game on, SCOMSSS, Game on.

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:22 pm

Managerr wrote:

Nice try. You conveniently overlooked:

MOTHER MAYI 47-6966 OLD HABITS (3 Cool

NORTH FORK

I almost killed it, but failed. Sad

Either way, Game on, SCOMSSS, Game on.

and adding Wink

Father O'Malley's ROOK TV

as Managerr implies, the lead by yOURBAGD is a mere/big TWO

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:54 pm

Well if this TW has been nothing else, it will have an exciting finish!

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:21 am

Advising all .......

There appears to be an infraction involving a Team having six warriors or eliminating and adding a warrior inappropriately between round 9 and 10. This is being investigated. If so, the scoring will be significantly impacted.

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Mar 10, 2008 Posts: 1999

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Sep 13, 2006 Posts: 1020

I have to agree with Trip ??

Why the hell would you mention it until you found out, (just to stir up people???), and second what infraction? Certainly, not by us and we certainly have not accused any of you.

And a quick side note. Our team worked our ass off this weekend, with nothing but honor. A comment like yours raises suspicion against all teams and I find that insulting after what we went through to manage this. I expect more from you until this is fully investigated.

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:21 pm

I think I can see what the issue is.

I know an issue similar came up during the ToGS if memory serves me right where a dead TV replaced a live warrior without a DA. I believe it is possible to bring a dead warrior back without a DA.

That all being said I know NOTHING of what is going on so I will stay out of it until more comes to light.

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:46 pm

Have some of you SCOMSSSers really been playing for 20+ years that you don't know basic game mechanics?

You cannot have 6 warriors on your team, nor is there a way to "inappropriately remove a warrior" without RSI knowing about and suspending you. (Go ahead and try it)

Or perhaps you guys are looking at the wrong copy of the newsletter again?

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:55 pm

Did this involve an input error where a warrior SHOULD have been Da'd but WASN'T?

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:50 pm

bump.... this is interesting

Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:34 am

Street_Legal wrote:

I think I can see what the issue is.

I know an issue similar came up during the ToGS if memory serves me right where a dead TV replaced a live warrior without a DA. I believe it is possible to bring a dead warrior back without a DA.

That all being said I know NOTHING of what is going on so I will stay out of it until more comes to light.

Nice catch. I have seen this done before, but the only difference is that in this contest there is a -5 for a DA. IMHO this was done with total understanding of what the actions were. That is only my feeling and not discussed with any others. I understand I am on one of the teams that is trying to win this, and it may look like sour grapes to some. As so many try to do when something like this happens, If you related this infraction (illegal substitution) to any sport the game would be forfeited.

Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:38 am

Quote:

As so many try to do when something like this happens, If you related this infraction (illegal substitution) to any sport the game would be forfeited.

Illegal means "against" the rules. And nothing of the sort occurred. (And as others have pointed out to the commissioners, this is not the first time this has happened in the Turf War and has been allowed previously)

Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:42 am

Grimm wrote:

I have to agree with Trip ??

Why the hell would you mention it until you found out, (just to stir up people???), and second what infraction? Certainly, not by us and we certainly have not accused any of you.

the infraction is pretty obvious. No one accused you. The statement was there was an infraction. I am sure it is being discussed but the two that are running this.

And a quick side note. Our team worked our ass off this weekend, with nothing but honor. A comment like yours raises suspicion against all teams and I find that insulting after what we went through to manage this. I expect more from you until this is fully investigated.

There is no doubt of the effort that all of you put forward, and you are to be commended for it.

No matter how this turns out, there will be hard feelings. The shame of it is that players are put into a situation that will only end in bad blood. Any time someone bends the rules or breaks them to gain an advantage, it effects everyone in the contest.

Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:46 am

Quote:

No matter how this turns out, there will be hard feelings. The shame of it is that players are put into a situation that will only end in bad blood. Any time someone bends the rules or breaks them to gain an advantage, it effects everyone in the contest.

Any time people whine (like you have pretty much every single time things haven't gone your way) there will be hard feelings. My only regret is not having the Adepts TC thrown to Grimm to not having further buried you.

In your case, it absolutely is sour grapes because you knew I had done it earlier in this same Turf War and said *nothing*. You can't even bother to keep your team on maintenance and now suddenly you care?