What styles are believed to have the slowest endurance burn? Would think AB,PR,PS and TP possibly? Anyone have an order?
Nomad ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 2227
Location: Fargo, ND
Posted:
Thu Oct 14, 2010 6:44 pm
Khisanth wrote:
What styles are believed to have the slowest endurance burn? Would think AB,PR,PS and TP possibly? Anyone have an order?
Striker also has a very low burn rate. Of course, since they generally run high numbers, they still run out of endurance faster than the styles you listed. But that is how they are run, not endurance burn rate.
The Consortium ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 10142
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting
Posted:
Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:20 am
Khisanth wrote:
What styles are believed to have the slowest endurance burn? Would think AB,PR,PS and TP possibly? Anyone have an order?
We'd guess ....
PS, TP
ST, AB
BA, PR
WS, PL
SL, LU
appx.
_________________ The Consortium: Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014; 1213 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 176K+ fights and 118K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @2085; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1976; Lenpros DM30 @ 1792; Fandils DM46 @1727
Action Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Mar 26, 2010
Posts: 728
Location: Virginia
Posted:
Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:48 am
The Consortium wrote:
Khisanth wrote:
What styles are believed to have the slowest endurance burn? Would think AB,PR,PS and TP possibly? Anyone have an order?
We'd guess ....
PS, TP
ST, AB
BA, PR
WS, PL
SL, LU
appx.
I would have to put Parry Ripostes right behind Pikers and TP. I think AB is one step up on Striker.
_________________ The Monsantis 81
Golgotha's Blooms 21
Token Entry 47
Il Malvagio 32
The Fallen Angels 28
Assurnasirbanipal ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 1769
Location: San Jose, CA
Posted:
Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:51 am
Low Burn
AB, PR, PS, STK, TP
Medium
B, SL
High Burn
L, PL, WOS
This is very hard to quantify, since strategy and weight plays such a large role in this. (the styles I was waffling on were PR, TP, and SL)
MarmaDuke Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 869
Location: NYC tri-state area
Posted:
Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:24 am
I'd have to break this up into two groups and then rank them based on typical rythems that they run. A ST who has a lower endurance burn than say a WS tends to run hot off the bat, while a WS could run Lo/Lo to Hi/Mod.
Offensives (high burn to low burn):
LU-SL-BA-ST-AB
Defensives:
WS-PL-PS-PR-TP
The only reason I'm ranking PS with a higher burn than PR/TP is their ability to run hot (similar to ST) and as a result they would then burn faster than some other defensives... but then again you could do the same with a PR or OTP I suppose. I think the exact rankings are subjective at the end of the day.
_________________ -Marma Duke-
Deviation, State of Mind, Da Dog Powndaz, Pyromania, Rap Attacks, Slamma Jamma
May your blades always be sharp, and your opponents armor always have rust.....
Woody Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Posts: 989
Location: Lake Powell
Posted:
Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:49 pm
Encumberance relative to carry capacity seems to affect the styles differently.
Had several pikers over the years who had poor/vlittle endurance and could last quite long if they ran naked.
Plungers also were sensitive to encumberance changes.
Never made many lungers or rippers, so haven't observed enough to tell anything.
Slashers, wos's, tp's, and bashers seem to be less sensitive to encumberance changes.
Can't really tell with aimers or strikers.
Seems totally dependent on warrior design.
<shrug>
YMMV.
_________________ ...
Not enough time on my hands anymore...
...
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
