Joined: Apr 26, 2003
Posts: 674
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:53 am
It's going to be a small, barely-populated arena, I suspect. Marmaduke suggested allowing warriors with "minimum" tourney experience.
If this was allowed, what would the cut off be? 10FE? 20FE? 30FE?
I like 10FE or less; ZERO preferentially. That might fit a couple of fighters I had that were sent in to just one tourney... but that's it. On the other hand, more than 10FE and it seems like just any other arena. Any other opinions?
Oh, and how is RSI going to feel about printing out reams of old fighters so that guys like me (who have tossed out a lot of decades-old stuff) going to sort through their ancient warriors and see who (if anyone) fits the criteria?
_________________ "Don't make me destroy you." -- Darth Vader
Tripwire ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 1999
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:53 am
I am definately in also. I would just have to get a full list of my adm guys to see who hasn't run in tournaments. I may have unknowingly waaaaay back when ran a few bashers and whatnot before I knew anything about the game, but I have no clue so would just have to match up the FE with the records I guess.
_________________ Active Arenas: Of Wolf and Man - DM 18, DM 81
Alliance: The Iron Council
Elephant Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Apr 16, 2003
Posts: 958
Location: NoCal
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:58 am
KidArcane wrote:
It's going to be a small, barely-populated arena, I suspect. Marmaduke suggested allowing warriors with "minimum" tourney experience.
If this was allowed, what would the cut off be? 10FE? 20FE? 30FE?
I like 10FE or less; ZERO preferentially. That might fit a couple of fighters I had that were sent in to just one tourney... but that's it. On the other hand, more than 10FE and it seems like just any other arena. Any other opinions?
Oh, and how is RSI going to feel about printing out reams of old fighters so that guys like me (who have tossed out a lot of decades-old stuff) going to sort through their ancient warriors and see who (if anyone) fits the criteria?
This is just my opinion, I think no tourney means exactly that. So I would be against any tourney FE.
I feel this arena could really take off. I'm sure there are alot of warriors out there which are retired that would unretire for something like this. I think we could name the arena "Favre".
RSI doesn't have to print out alot of reams, just ask for mini-overviews to be emailed to you.
Nomad ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 2227
Location: Fargo, ND
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:21 am
Elephant wrote:
KidArcane wrote:
It's going to be a small, barely-populated arena, I suspect. Marmaduke suggested allowing warriors with "minimum" tourney experience.
If this was allowed, what would the cut off be? 10FE? 20FE? 30FE?
I like 10FE or less; ZERO preferentially. That might fit a couple of fighters I had that were sent in to just one tourney... but that's it. On the other hand, more than 10FE and it seems like just any other arena. Any other opinions?
Oh, and how is RSI going to feel about printing out reams of old fighters so that guys like me (who have tossed out a lot of decades-old stuff) going to sort through their ancient warriors and see who (if anyone) fits the criteria?
This is just my opinion, I think no tourney means exactly that. So I would be against any tourney FE.
I feel this arena could really take off. I'm sure there are alot of warriors out there which are retired that would unretire for something like this. I think we could name the arena "Favre".
RSI doesn't have to print out alot of reams, just ask for mini-overviews to be emailed to you.
I agree. I think no-tourney mean no-tourney. If there was a big push for it I could possibly see letting in those with 2-3 FE, but I would prefer not.
Ok, I love the name "Favre." That did make me laugh.
Tripwire ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 1999
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:35 am
I agree as well, no tourney!
_________________ Active Arenas: Of Wolf and Man - DM 18, DM 81
Alliance: The Iron Council
_Buri_ ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Posts: 1040
Location: Asgard
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:32 am
Even though I have no prospects to send there, I'd think it should be all-or-nothing. It may take a bit longer to get rolling that way, as people like me would have to depend on the 81 crew.
_________________ Buri, Crapmaster 2012, Crapgiver 2017
Aesir 003 & 100 & 102, ACME 009, Berk 025, Venture Bros 051 etc.
Terminator ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jul 18, 2006
Posts: 1170
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:49 am
I echo what has already been stated.....No Tourney means no Tourney (in my humble opinion).
_________________ We don't get mad, we get even!
Vanek, Manager of the Warmasters (DM-81)
gentleben ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Posts: 4018
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:13 am
I have 3 but can't afford to start them until after TW7 ends.
My vote is 0 tourney 0 prizes period, in my mumble opinion
_________________ Gentleben
Ben's Bazaar-21
Caress of Steel-28
Secret Squirrels-32
He Be GBs-33
Time Stallyans-45
Pawn of Prophecy-47
Primal Instinct-81
Misfit Managers-1,2,3,4,18,25,29
Nomad ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 2227
Location: Fargo, ND
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:15 am
gentleben wrote:
I have 3 but can't afford to start them until after TW7 ends.
My vote is 0 tourney 0 prizes period, in my mumble opinion
And when does TW7 end?
gentleben ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Posts: 4018
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:22 am
Nomad wrote:
gentleben wrote:
I have 3 but can't afford to start them until after TW7 ends.
My vote is 0 tourney 0 prizes period, in my mumble opinion
And when does TW7 end?
OCT is the last turn
_________________ Gentleben
Ben's Bazaar-21
Caress of Steel-28
Secret Squirrels-32
He Be GBs-33
Time Stallyans-45
Pawn of Prophecy-47
Primal Instinct-81
Misfit Managers-1,2,3,4,18,25,29
Darque ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 21, 2002
Posts: 2528
Location: Virginia
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:20 pm
List updated. If I missed you, let me know and I'll add you.
Elephant -- you'll be sending 4
Kid Arcane -- No Tourney 100%
Scruffy Puff -- how many?
Gentleben -- I'm going to assume after the next split, so the TW should be over then. I put you down for 3
I will have to get mini's but I am pretty sure I have at least 3.
_________________ Active Arenas: Of Wolf and Man - DM 18, DM 81
Alliance: The Iron Council
gentleben ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Posts: 4018
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:22 pm
Nomad wrote:
Elephant wrote:
KidArcane wrote:
It's going to be a small, barely-populated arena, I suspect. Marmaduke suggested allowing warriors with "minimum" tourney experience.
If this was allowed, what would the cut off be? 10FE? 20FE? 30FE?
I like 10FE or less; ZERO preferentially. That might fit a couple of fighters I had that were sent in to just one tourney... but that's it. On the other hand, more than 10FE and it seems like just any other arena. Any other opinions?
Oh, and how is RSI going to feel about printing out reams of old fighters so that guys like me (who have tossed out a lot of decades-old stuff) going to sort through their ancient warriors and see who (if anyone) fits the criteria?
This is just my opinion, I think no tourney means exactly that. So I would be against any tourney FE.
I feel this arena could really take off. I'm sure there are alot of warriors out there which are retired that would unretire for something like this. I think we could name the arena "Favre".
RSI doesn't have to print out alot of reams, just ask for mini-overviews to be emailed to you.
I agree. I think no-tourney mean no-tourney. If there was a big push for it I could possibly see letting in those with 2-3 FE, but I would prefer not.
Ok, I love the name "Favre." That did make me laugh.
If there is a vote on names for the arena I would not cast it for Favre, I like the guy but just not enough to name an arena after him. My vote would be to name it after the manager that died from 47 that they are using in place of North Fork right now TEMPLE OF ABARSIS ARENA, then there will be a premanant memorial for him. Some people in North Fork want their arena name back anyway.
_________________ Gentleben
Ben's Bazaar-21
Caress of Steel-28
Secret Squirrels-32
He Be GBs-33
Time Stallyans-45
Pawn of Prophecy-47
Primal Instinct-81
Misfit Managers-1,2,3,4,18,25,29
Elephant Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Apr 16, 2003
Posts: 958
Location: NoCal
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:33 pm
Darque, after another look, I'm guesing 3. I may fight a 4th(Mustang Boss) from time to time.
Nomad ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 2227
Location: Fargo, ND
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:17 pm
gentleben wrote:
Nomad wrote:
Elephant wrote:
KidArcane wrote:
It's going to be a small, barely-populated arena, I suspect. Marmaduke suggested allowing warriors with "minimum" tourney experience.
If this was allowed, what would the cut off be? 10FE? 20FE? 30FE?
I like 10FE or less; ZERO preferentially. That might fit a couple of fighters I had that were sent in to just one tourney... but that's it. On the other hand, more than 10FE and it seems like just any other arena. Any other opinions?
Oh, and how is RSI going to feel about printing out reams of old fighters so that guys like me (who have tossed out a lot of decades-old stuff) going to sort through their ancient warriors and see who (if anyone) fits the criteria?
This is just my opinion, I think no tourney means exactly that. So I would be against any tourney FE.
I feel this arena could really take off. I'm sure there are alot of warriors out there which are retired that would unretire for something like this. I think we could name the arena "Favre".
RSI doesn't have to print out alot of reams, just ask for mini-overviews to be emailed to you.
I agree. I think no-tourney mean no-tourney. If there was a big push for it I could possibly see letting in those with 2-3 FE, but I would prefer not.
Ok, I love the name "Favre." That did make me laugh.
If there is a vote on names for the arena I would not cast it for Favre, I like the guy but just not enough to name an arena after him. My vote would be to name it after the manager that died from 47 that they are using in place of North Fork right now TEMPLE OF ABARSIS ARENA, then there will be a premanant memorial for him. Some people in North Fork want their arena name back anyway.
"Favre" made me laugh, but I wouldn't actually want the arena named after him. I'm a Viking fan and Favre is painful in multiple ways. But it was funny.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum