| Author |
Message |
Owsly
Advanced Expert Poster
Joined: Feb 19, 2009
Posts: 176
Location: Largo FL
|
 Posted:
Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:32 am |
  |
Wanted some feedback on these.
9-21-7-9-9-7-11 I was thinking 10-21-7-13-15-7-11 WOS
6-10-8-13-10-12-11 My thoughts are varied on this one.
12-10-8-17-10-12-15 Striker or 7-10-8-17-15-12-15 Striker/AB
10-10-8-17-10-12-17 typical AB or 7-10-8-17-10-15-17 not so typical AB
These are just toss around ideas and thought I'd put them out there for other peeps opinions and 
Owsly |
|
|
   |
|
The Consortium
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 8376
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling from SC
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:01 pm |
|
| Owsly wrote: |
Wanted some feedback on these.
9-21-7-9-9-7-11 I was thinking 10-21-7-13-15-7-11 WOS
6-10-8-13-10-12-11 My thoughts are varied on this one.
12-10-8-17-10-12-15 Striker or 7-10-8-17-15-12-15 Striker/AB
10-10-8-17-10-12-17 typical AB or 7-10-8-17-10-15-17 not so typical AB
These are just toss around ideas and thought I'd put them out there for other peeps opinions and
Owsly |
Too many points on the base (73) for #1, hence not sure. We also tend to go with 11 WT if we cannot get 15.
#2 lotsa choices. Our fave 12-10-8-17-10-16-11 ST |
_________________
Ye Old Consortium Scribe & Crapmaster 2013
959 ADM graduates (encompassing 40+ manager IDs) including 95K+ fights and 60K+ wins plus 4 teams with over 1000 wins (Animal Farm DM11 @1435*; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1363; Lenpros DM30 @ 1353; Fandils DM46 1247) |
|
|
|
One Armed Bandit
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Apr 15, 2004
Posts: 2464
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:02 pm |
|
| Owsly wrote: |
Wanted some feedback on these.
9-21-7-9-9-7-11 I was thinking 10-21-7-13-15-7-11 WOS
|
The starting numbers for the first guy add up to 73 points, so there is a mistake in there somewhere.
Edit: Consortium beat me by a minute! I must be getting slow in my old age. |
|
|
|
|
Assurnasirbanipal
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 1324
Location: San Jose, CA
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:12 pm |
|
Hey Owsly. Your first design is nice. I'm also a fan of 11 wit, especially if the points are more useful somewhere else. In this case, you can get to 12 strength, which is a big breakpoint for damage with size 7. Probably worth the wit sacrifice. If you added a couple points to con, I'd go with 19 con and have both 12 str and 13 wit!
I'd most likely roll the second guy as a basher with Consortium's numbers and hope it rolled up so well that I'd want to run it. If I was told I had to run it, I'd likely make it into a speed AB similar to your 4th design (ending with either 14 or 16 speed, not 15).
Decent arena warriors both of them. The first guy is even a bit unique with the super high con. |
|
|
 |
|
The Consortium
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 8376
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling from SC
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:56 pm |
|
| One Armed Bandit wrote: |
| Owsly wrote: |
Wanted some feedback on these.
9-21-7-9-9-7-11 I was thinking 10-21-7-13-15-7-11 WOS
|
The starting numbers for the first guy add up to 73 points, so there is a mistake in there somewhere.
Edit: Consortium beat me by a minute! I must be getting slow in my old age. |
Consortium = +4 Decise |
_________________
Ye Old Consortium Scribe & Crapmaster 2013
959 ADM graduates (encompassing 40+ manager IDs) including 95K+ fights and 60K+ wins plus 4 teams with over 1000 wins (Animal Farm DM11 @1435*; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1363; Lenpros DM30 @ 1353; Fandils DM46 1247) |
|
|
|
Owsly
Advanced Expert Poster
Joined: Feb 19, 2009
Posts: 176
Location: Largo FL
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:51 am |
|
| Quote: |
| Too many points on the base (73) for #1, hence not sure. We also tend to go with 11 WT if we cannot get 15. |
 Sorry about the input error on number 1. Wish he started out with the last number being an 11 in deftness but alas it is only an 8. So the actual initial roll up is really; 9-21-7-9-9-7-8 |
|
|
|
|
MarmaDuke
Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 823
Location: NYC tri-state area
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:49 am |
|
Assuming the following are arena warriors.....
#1 I'd be tempted to go 12-21-7-15-9-7-13 TP
#2 I'd probably lean towards 7-11-8-17-10-14-17 AB |
_________________
-Marma Duke-
Deviation, State of Mind, Da Dog Powndaz, Pyromania, Rap Attacks, Slamma Jamma
May your blades always be sharp, and your opponents armor always have rust..... |
|
 |
|
gentleben
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Posts: 3048
Location: Round Rock, Tx
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:34 am |
|
| Owsly wrote: |
Wanted some feedback on these.
9-21-7-9-9-7-8 I was thinking 10-21-7-13-15-7-11 WOS
6-10-8-13-10-12-11 My thoughts are varied on this one.
12-10-8-17-10-12-15 Striker or 7-10-8-17-15-12-15 Striker/AB
10-10-8-17-10-12-17 typical AB or 7-10-8-17-10-15-17 not so typical AB
These are just toss around ideas and thought I'd put them out there for other peeps opinions and
Owsly |
Now that you have fixed the first guy I feel free to give you my thoughts:
9-21-7-9-9-7-8-->13-21-7-15-9-8-11 TP
6-10-8-13-10-12-11-->9-11-8-17-10-12-17 AB |
_________________
Gentleben
Ben's Bazaar-21
Secret Squirrels-32
Pawn of Prophecy-47 (moved from 25) |
|
|
|
Darque
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 21, 2002
Posts: 2307
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:05 am |
|
#1 -- 10-21-7-13-15-7-11 TP. I'd wait and see how well he was going to learn Parry before I burned anything. Otherwise, I'd bump STR x1 and them just train skills until he either learns all his Parry or learning slows to a stand still. All of it really comes down to your goals with the warrior and your patience (because lots of trains with a 15 Will tests the patience at times depending on how well he rolls for them).
#2 -- Consortium's numbers and ST or BA depending on my mood. |
_________________
Master Darque
Darque Forces -- 45, 47
Darque Ages -- 81
Darque Ages, et al. -- 107 |
|
 |
|
|
|
