Joined: May 06, 2003
Posts: 2490
Location: Frozen Tundra of North Dakota
Posted:
Sat Apr 11, 2020 9:50 am
Get it, cause of holy week?? Yeah. So, I ordered a few team sheets recently, which I rarely do, to help pass quarantine time and hopefully find a few tourney guys to cultivate. No Holy Grail, but I was pretty pleased with this sheet. Don't think I've gotten it before, all 5 are fantastic! What would you do with them?
13-10-5-16-9-10-7 ---> ?
10-6-13-14-11-5-12 ---> ?
18-4-9-11-13-10-5 ----> ?
9-13-7-10-12-3-16 ----> ?
13-3-11-8-15-7-13 ----> ?
I haven't sent it in yet, but I'll show what I've initially designed soon. Enjoy!
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Posts: 393
Location: the BIG apple
Posted:
Sat Apr 11, 2020 11:58 am
13-10-5-16-9-10-7 ---> 17-10-5-21-10-10-11 ST .. dont risk getting hose on dmg ..instant good dmg or better .. great tourney caliber warrior
10-6-13-14-11-5-12 ---> ? 11-7-13-17-17-5-15 LU
18-4-9-11-13-10-5 ----> 18-4-9-17-17-12-7 BA ..roll the dice on dmg and skip the 21 STR
9-13-7-10-12-3-16 ----> 9-14-7-15-15-3-21 AB ..I like this guy ..could make a fun rookie
13-3-11-8-15-7-13 ----> 13-6-11-13-21-7-13 LU ...good arena warrior
You were right, this is a great team sheet where you get 5 good warriors right out of the gate.
Nomad ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 2223
Location: Fargo, ND
Posted:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:40 pm
13-10-5-16-9-10-7 ---> 17-10-5-21-9-10-11 One point left. Probably will, maybe spd. Striker
10-6-13-14-11-5-12 ---> 11-7-13-17-17-5-15 What do you want? Lunger
18-4-9-11-13-10-5 ----> 21-4-9-17-17-11-5 Basher
9-13-7-10-12-3-16 ----> 9-14-7-15-15-3-21 AB
13-3-11-8-15-7-13 ----> 14-3-11-13-21-7-15 Slasher maybe. I hate pumping con on an offensive unless you get an impressive total on something like a lunger. But slow and can't take damage is awkward. Nice arena guy in a couple of ways.
Nomad ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 2223
Location: Fargo, ND
Posted:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:40 pm
13-10-5-16-9-10-7 ---> 17-10-5-21-9-10-11 One point left. Probably will, maybe spd. Striker
10-6-13-14-11-5-12 ---> 11-7-13-17-17-5-15 What do you want? Lunger
18-4-9-11-13-10-5 ----> 21-4-9-17-17-11-5 Basher
9-13-7-10-12-3-16 ----> 9-14-7-15-15-3-21 AB
13-3-11-8-15-7-13 ----> 14-3-11-13-21-7-15 Slasher maybe. I hate pumping con on an offensive unless you get an impressive total on something like a lunger. But slow and can't take damage is awkward. Nice arena guy in a couple of ways.
Street_Legal ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Posts: 3559
Location: The Big D (etroit) area
Posted:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:00 pm
I'd send them to me!
_________________ A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.
Thomas Jefferson
Stik ArchMaster Poster
Joined: May 06, 2003
Posts: 2490
Location: Frozen Tundra of North Dakota
Posted:
Tue Apr 14, 2020 12:16 pm
Many thanks for the comments thus far. Here's what I'm thinking now:
13-10-5-16-9-10-7 ---> 17-10-5-21-10-11-11 ST was gonna go for the 14 WT to burn but this design's way better!
10-6-13-14-11-5-12 ---> 10-6-13-20-17-5-13 LU the 17-17-15 is safer but I don't mind the 21 WT burn to give it a boost for early tourneys.
18-4-9-11-13-10-5 ----> 21-4-9-17-17-10-6 BA wanted to keep ST at 18 but how often do you get a 21 ST guy that's decent elsewhere? Go to extremes and burn the DF to 7 for WH, MA, etc.
9-13-7-10-12-3-16 ----> 10-13-7-15-15-3-21 AB the consensus, and what I already had down, a no-brainer beautiful aimer!
13-3-11-8-15-7-13 ----> 13-5-11-14-21-7-13 LU will get good dam. and maybe good end., 14 att/10 def, and again I ain't afraid to burn it up a little early!
Joined: Aug 03, 2003
Posts: 541
Location: The Dark Citadel, CT, USA
Posted:
Thu Apr 16, 2020 4:40 am
I wouldn't go ST with that first guy for what it's worth.
13-10-5-16-9-10-7 --> 15-11-5-21-15-10-7 is a sweet little LU. Decent chance at good/good, some speed, defense... Suited to SH/SS vs light and will do fine with LO vs. heavy. Not dissimilar at all to last July's Champs TC and another TC of mine. Just another option.
DeGotti Advanced Master Poster
Joined: Jul 19, 2002
Posts: 479
Posted:
Thu Apr 16, 2020 2:10 pm
I thought that sheet looked familiar. This is what I did...
He is a lunger with ST=18 CN=5(1) SZ=9 WT=17 WL=17 SP=10 DF=9.
He is right handed, is very intelligent, is active, is slightly uncoordinated, has a good endurance, is very frail, is incredibly quick and elusive, does good damage, has an Expert in initiative, and has an Expert in decisiveness
He is a striker with ST=17 CN=10 SZ=5 WT=21 WL=10 SP=10 DF=11.
He is right handed, is a genius, is quick and active, can not take a lot of punishment, is incredibly quick and elusive, does good damage, has an Expert in initiative, and has an Advanced Expert in decisiveness
He is a aimed blow with ST=11(1) CN=13 SZ=7 WT=14(1) WL=17 SP=3 DF=21. He is ambidextrous, is bright, has a good endurance, is incredibly quick and elusive, has a Master in attack, and has an Expert in defense
He is a striker with ST=11(1) CN=6 SZ=13 WT=17 WL=17 SP=6 DF=15.
He is right handed, is very intelligent, is quick and active, can not take a lot of punishment, can not carry a lot of weight, is incredibly quick and elusive, does good damage, and has an Advanced Expert in decisiveness
He was a parry-lunge with ST=13 CN=6(2) SZ=11 WT=14(1) WL=21 SP=7 DF=15. He was right handed, was bright, was quick and active, had a good endurance, could not take a lot of punishment, could not carry a lot of weight, was incredibly quick and elusive, did good damage, had an Expert in initiative, had an Advanced Expert in attack, and had an Advanced Expert in parry.
I'm not sure why I went PL on the last guy, I believe it was because I didn't want 2 LU's.
_________________ Cult of Bacchus (81)
Stik ArchMaster Poster
Joined: May 06, 2003
Posts: 2490
Location: Frozen Tundra of North Dakota
Posted:
Fri Apr 17, 2020 11:43 am
Thanks for putting that up there! Curious though, how they've done for you tourney-wise if you care to share. Are they all still in basic or have you graduated some?
I haven't participated in a tourney in many many years, so I'm going off of mini's here. This team is in DM#1, when Mannequin was running like 3 killer teams, it was a tough arena back then.
LU - No Tourney experience 6-5 Arena record
21 WT/10 WL ST - 4-3-1,39,12FE
AB - [6-7-0,37,23FE]
17/17 ST - [9-4-0,97,17FE]
PL - [9-4-0,97,17FE]
_________________ Cult of Bacchus (81)
Stik ArchMaster Poster
Joined: May 06, 2003
Posts: 2490
Location: Frozen Tundra of North Dakota
Posted:
Sun May 10, 2020 10:15 am
Got the overviews back:
13-10-5-16-9-10-7 ---> 17-10-5-21-10-11-11 ST hosed in init/rip
10-6-13-14-11-5-12 ---> 10-6-13-20-17-5-13 LU appears bonused init/par, just norm damage however
18-4-9-11-13-10-5 ----> 21-4-9-17-17-10-6 BA hosed in init, stuck with good damage too. Damn.
9-13-7-10-12-3-16 ----> 10-13-7-15-15-3-21 AB got exp/att so bonused there, norm damage.
13-3-11-8-15-7-13 ----> 13-5-11-14-21-7-13 LU came back looking very mode, 9/5/14/6/10/8, good dam. norm end.
So was a bit disappointed with the rolls, but what can you do. Still a great team!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum