TURN 13 / 400

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 11:08 pm

since Indimar's fallon (haha) down on the job, and i'm bored, who's got the scoop? Creepster? Rillion?

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Jul 17, 2002 Posts: 1054

Well, I will have some things to reveal but not until after the turn is due and it has been run. Wouldn't want to allow anyone to get in any last minute changes based on what I say. Very Happy

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:09 pm

We have written thousands of words in 13 Aradi spotlights. We have added over 300 personals to the arena. We have included 400+ tidbits from our friends at the AW&WFAFP. We even threw in a Duelmaster column or two.

We think we have run out of things to say. Wink

Uh, on secnd thought, Pretty Pandora has plenty to say:
... Soultaker would have been better off if he had not had a partner he had to carry. If he loses, he was colluded against by little you-know-who.
... I had great hopes for Mannequin and Samwise as a true, bloodthirsty killing team. They fizzled to middle of the road. Get me some BLOOD!
... TOGS has lousy rules. The team who kills most should win. The tie-breaker should be most down-challenges.
... The Delarquan entrants in this TOGS were really namby-pamby Andorian affiliates disguised as Delarqs. Probably paid to participate by Little Captain Colluder. Disgusting!
... The AW&WFAFP is a rag! It reports only what the Andorian-minded Editor allows. It failed even to report that Ultraist was actually a FONZ member.
... Lady E and Lady A SHOULD win. Only they truly "get it".
... TUM has not ever participated in TOGS. LHI, on the FONZ payroll to earn money for furniture, and Suave (disguised as TUM) represent that false team.
... The Creepster is really Rageman, and Manager has sold out to the FONZ. All his whistle-blowing has been a mere ruse.
So I say it ....................
Lady Pandora Stormme
Pretty Pandora
Pandora Of The Pretty Legs
Demoness Princess Pandora

Site Admin Joined: Jun 20, 2002 Posts: 1344

I am so busted...

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:05 am

The Consortium wrote:

We have written thousands of words in 13 Aradi spotlights. We have added over 300 personals to the arena. We have included 400+ tidbits from our friends at the AW&WFAFP. We even threw in a Duelmaster column or two.

We think we have run out of things to say. Wink

Uh, on secnd thought, Pretty Pandora has plenty to say:
... Soultaker would have been better off if he had not had a partner he had to carry. If he loses, he was colluded against by little you-know-who.
... I had great hopes for Mannequin and Samwise as a true, bloodthirsty killing team. They fizzled to middle of the road. Get me some BLOOD!
... TOGS has lousy rules. The team who kills most should win. The tie-breaker should be most down-challenges.
... The Delarquan entrants in this TOGS were really namby-pamby Andorian affiliates disguised as Delarqs. Probably paid to participate by Little Captain Colluder. Disgusting!
... The AW&WFAFP is a rag! It reports only what the Andorian-minded Editor allows. It failed even to report that Ultraist was actually a FONZ member.
... Lady E and Lady A SHOULD win. Only they truly "get it".
... TUM has not ever participated in TOGS. LHI, on the FONZ payroll to earn money for furniture, and Suave (disguised as TUM) represent that false team.
... The Creepster is really Rageman, and Manager has sold out to the FONZ. All his whistle-blowing has been a mere ruse.
So I say it ....................
Lady Pandora Stormme
Pretty Pandora
Pandora Of The Pretty Legs
Demoness Princess Pandora

And here I was hoping that if Soultaker lost it would be becaues he was too busy focusing on me and Street Legal that he self-imploded. Damn, talk about a way to ruin my weekend. Wink

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Jul 17, 2002 Posts: 1054

Rillion wrote:

Well, I will have some things to reveal but not until after the turn is due and it has been run. Wouldn't want to allow anyone to get in any last minute changes based on what I say. Very Happy

Having no chance myself I did my best this last turn to hinder the top teams. I think I threw downchallenges out to all the top teams except for the Nuln/Snotman pairing. I figured it would be an exciting conclusion if they could jump to the top on the last turn vaulting past two other teams to take the prize. Besides of the "contenders" left in it, they had the highest paying odds.

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:46 pm

Quote:

I think I threw downchallenges out to all the top teams except for the Nuln/Snotman pairing. I figured it would be an exciting conclusion if they could jump to the top on the last turn vaulting past two other teams to take the prize.

I'm curious as to why you thought that this information might cause us to make last minute changes! <zing!>

Nuln and Snotman are the least offensive winners to the majority of people and would be deserving based on their win percentage in this TOGS, but let's face it--Them winning TOGS would be like Erika winning Big Brother.

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:03 pm

Managerr wrote:

Quote:

I think I threw downchallenges out to all the top teams except for the Nuln/Snotman pairing. I figured it would be an exciting conclusion if they could jump to the top on the last turn vaulting past two other teams to take the prize.

I'm curious as to why you thought that this information might cause us to make last minute changes! <zing!>

Nuln and Snotman are the least offensive winners to the majority of people and would be deserving based on their win percentage in this TOGS, but let's face it--Them winning TOGS would be like Erika winning Big Brother.

ironic that the least offensive team also popularized the nutsack (tm). Laughing

and Manalger, you really need to come up with some analogies that don't have to do with reality shows. Laughing

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Jul 17, 2002 Posts: 1054

Managerr wrote:

I'm curious as to why you thought that this information might cause us to make last minute changes! <zing!>

Cause since my downchallenges would likely happen first there would be no reason for you to challenge my puds. So you might make changes to your challenges. Duh!

Managerr wrote:

Them winning TOGS would be like Erika winning Big Brother.

Who winning what now? That last part makes absolutely no sense. Confused

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Jul 17, 2002 Posts: 1054

Turns posted btw.

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:07 pm

Rillion wrote:

Well, I will have some things to reveal but not until after the turn is due and it has been run. Wouldn't want to allow anyone to get in any last minute changes based on what I say. Very Happy

Having no chance myself I did my best this last turn to hinder the top teams. I think I threw downchallenges out to all the top teams except for the Nuln/Snotman pairing. I figured it would be an exciting conclusion if they could jump to the top on the last turn vaulting past two other teams to take the prize. Besides of the "contenders" left in it, they had the highest paying odds.

at first I read that as the other "C" word. thanks, Rilly!

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:28 pm

Rillion wrote:

Managerr wrote:

I'm curious as to why you thought that this information might cause us to make last minute changes! <zing!>

Cause since my downchallenges would likely happen first there would be no reason for you to challenge my puds. So you might make changes to your challenges. Duh!

Managerr wrote:

Them winning TOGS would be like Erika winning Big Brother.

Who winning what now? That last part makes absolutely no sense. Confused

It makes perfect sense if you're from Chilltown. Cool