New team for consideration

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:02 am

Was going to use this or a similar team in the allegedly new startup arena, but since we do not think it will happen anytime soon, we are open to thoughts .....................

Must be arena team
Must design/run all characters

9-3-14-17-13-5-9
7-9-6-10-14-15-9
9-5-13-17-5-13-8
5-12-9-11-5-18-10
13-8-11-8-15-10-5

Normally we would list or expect the author's ideas first, but we thought we would see what thoughts are out there without infringing our ideas.
NOTE: They are already designed (tentatively) and we will reveal our tentative designs and any changes we make as a result of your ideas.

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Jul 18, 2006 Posts: 1011

9-3-14-17-13-5-9 --> 13-3-14-21-17-5-11 ST/BA

7-9-6-10-14-15-9 --> 10-9-6-15-17-16-11 ST/SL/LU/BA

9-5-13-17-5-13-8 --> 9-5-13-21-9-16-11 ST

5-12-9-11-5-18-10 --> 8-12-9-17-9-18-11 ST

13-8-11-8-15-10-5 --> 15-8-11-10-20-10-10 burned to 17-8-11-11-21-10-11 LU

Wow, seems like all I see these days are Strikers everywhere! I hate having more than 2 of the same style on any team, but 3 of the 5 above legitimately look like then should be ST's to maximize their potential. I am very interested to see how my numbers compared to yours and your thoughts.

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Mar 10, 2008 Posts: 1837

As usual will not peruse anyone before my post to keep thoughts honest.

9-3-14-17-13-5-9 = ST - 9-3-14-21-17-8-11

7-9-6-10-14-15-9 = SL - 10-9-6-15-17-16-11

9-5-13-17-5-13-8 = ST - 9-5-13-21-11-14-11 (I can't STAND VL End, if you don't care I would put 13 DF, 9 WL for another att point)

5-12-9-11-5-18-10 = 8-12-9-17-9-18-11 ummmm...Arena AB?, maybe a weird PR?

13-8-11-8-15-10-5 = BA - 14-8-11-13-21-10-7 (Also possible HA/BS Slasher)

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:50 am

9-3-14-17-13-5-9 -------> 11-3-14-21-17-7-11 BA

Chose BA since there's already ST's on the sheet. Could try SL but CN too low for me.

7-9-6-10-14-15-9 -------> 9-9-6-15-17-15-13 PS

I really like this one! Have one similar; 9-8-5-15-17-17-13 rolled out normal/good bonused in att/ init/ and def.

9-5-13-17-5-13-8 -------> 9-5-13-21-9-14-13 ST

5-12-9-11-5-18-10 ------->10-12-9-17-7-18-11 ST

13-8-11-8-15-10-5 -------> 15-14-11-8-19-10-7 TP

And last but not least... couldn't be a Consortium team without one scum, eh? Burn everything twice and CN a third. I have little doubt that you wouldn't run this to a 32-8 or somesuch...

Kharadmon

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:14 am

12-3-14-21-17-6-11 LU/SL/ST
12-9-6-16-16-15-10 BA/LU/SL
10-5-13-21-11-13-11 ST/PS
8-12-9-17-9-18-11 PS/ST
13-8-11-14-20-10-8 SL/LU/BA

I usually don't like to have two of the same style on an arena team at once. Number 2 and 5 I feel are best as burners.

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:48 pm

And now…comedy relief…er… I mean my opinion.
9-3-14-17-13-5-9--> 9-3-14-21-17-4-15 Aimed Blow
7-9-6-10-14-15-9-->11-9-6-16-16-15-11 Lunger
9-5-13-17-5-13-8-->13-5-13-21-11-13-8 Striker
5-12-9-11-5-18-10-->11-12-9-16-8-18-10 Striker
13-8-11-8-15-10-5-->13-8-11-14-17-10-11 Basher

Yeah, my designs suck.

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:43 am

Our initial "tentative" designs were:
13-3-14-21-17-5-11 BA
11-9-6-15-17-15-11 SL
11-5-15-21-9-14-11 ST
9-12-9-17-8-18-11 ST
14-8-11-10-20-11-10 BA burner

Mighty offensive, eh?

The chosen designs, after all y'alls (learned that here in the South) input:
12-3-14-21-17-6-11 BA (mod - ST/SP)
10-9-6-15-17-16-11 SL (same)
11-5-13-21-9-14-11 ST (same)
9-12-9-17-8-18-11 PS (changed style)
14-8-11-10-20-11-10 BA (same)

Thanks all!