Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting
Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:49 pm
I am interested in your opinion as to:
1. are any/all of these aimers tourney potential?
2. your ranking of best to worst
A. 4-16-6-11-17-9-21 norm edu/norm dmg mode
B. 3-11-14-21-8-6-21 vL endu/norm dmg +1/4 att (exp), -1/4 Init
C. 7-8-13-15-15-5-21 poor endu/great dmg +3/4 parry, + dmg
Us? none; C-B-A
_________________ Ye Old Consortium Scribe & Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014
1086 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 139K+ fights and 90K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @1787*; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1705; Lenpros DM30 @ 1588; Fandils DM46 @ 1519
One Armed Bandit ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Apr 15, 2004
Sat Dec 21, 2013 3:01 pm
C-B-A, as well.
I'd run C-B if they were on teams with other tourney warriors, as most of my warriors are. I wouldn't run A.
Mannequin Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Sep 15, 2002
Location: East Wenatchee, WA
Sat Dec 21, 2013 9:10 pm
_________________ "Mannequin is my name. I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity."
"Your island"? You mean Sunset?
"Yeah. It's mine".
"You're a madman!"
"Aye, I've come to the right place then."
Street_Legal ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Location: The Big D (etroit) area
Sat Dec 21, 2013 11:51 pm
C-B-A here too bro!
I just can't take a c-a-b the accents are hard to deal with!
C: One train in either ST, CN, or WL and you should get normal endurance (at 240 no matter which you train WL=15 for CN/ST and CN/ST=15 for WL)! My worst endurance guys have been 234 and still poor endurance (usually a combo of 26 ST+CN and a 9 WL); I have at least 3 of those alive somewhere right now as I look!
A: Should've been listed with +damage also! 4 ST 6 SZ is L+ on the Terrablood chart! And I'd have been POSITIVE that he'd come back little damage!
I'd run all 3 in rookies. A is going to fall behind as it moves up in class due to the 11 WT but if he learns right, and gets a 1.33 or better average learn, he might be viable as he moves up.
Had a similar one WT-wise, 11(1)-4-11-13-17-12-17 +4 ATT(so like a +2 21 DF AB) poor(went to normal with ST train in tourney)/Great +damage, go 5-0 before ending 6-3 after meeting some STs, in a rookies mailer. Don't know if he's better suited for a mailer or a FtF since I've never been to a facer but that high CN should make him quite viable in rooks+; as stated before.
_________________ A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.
Last edited by Street_Legal on Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
Assurnasirbanipal ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Oct 21, 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Sun Dec 22, 2013 6:26 pm
If you want a simple answer, I'd say (for Rookies)
I'd try to run warrior B without question to graduation and hope to one day bust for glory.
I could see running A or C on a team with other warriors, maybe even give them a shot in Rookies (It amazes me what rookie AB's can luck into as far as wins). But if the rest of the team was scrubs, it is unlikely I'd run either of these guys.
_Buri_ Grandmaster Poster
Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:57 am
C-B-A, and I'd run B in tourneys... in fact I have! mine was 3-11-14-21-7-7-21 with good damage, best he did was 7-3-0 but you never know. I'd probably run C to graduation just to see what his favorites are, it could have long-term potential.
_________________ Buri, Crapmaster 2012, Crapgiver 2017
Aesir 003 & 100 & 102, ACME 009, Berk 025, Venture Bros 051 etc.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum