10-10-10-12-15-4-9

Advanced Expert Poster Joined: Jul 30, 2003 Posts: 115

I did get some interesting ones out of the 10 setups, all on different sheets of course.

so for this one i'm not sold on either of my designs and i'm interested in your thoughts, again.

10-10-10-12-15-4-9------>10-10-10-17-21-5-11 WS/LU

10-10-10-12-15-4-9------>10-10-10-17-17-5-15 PR

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:45 am

The_Mentors wrote:

I did get some interesting ones out of the 10 setups, all on different sheets of course.

so for this one i'm not sold on either of my designs and i'm interested in your thoughts, again.

10-10-10-12-15-4-9------>10-10-10-17-21-5-11 WS/LU

10-10-10-12-15-4-9------>10-10-10-17-17-5-15 PR

looks like a solid 11-10-10-17-21-4-11 to us
can be made several styles (LU, PL, PS, ST, SL, WS)
our fave is LU/SL

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:11 am

I would use Consortium's design.

In general, I recommend not adding to speed unless it is an offensive style that really wants decise skills. Even then, get decise skills from wit or will first, then speed (by adding to an even number).

Most of the time, points on speed are better placed elsewhere, in this case to get a better shot at good damage.

For style, I like most of the hybrid options (L/PL/PR/PS/TP/WOS). And offensive would not be a mistake. It's a great setup.

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 7:40 pm

The_Mentors wrote:

10-10-10-12-15-4-9------>10-10-10-17-17-5-15 PR

I like your parry riposte design.

ArchMaster Poster Joined: Jul 18, 2006 Posts: 1010

10-10-10-12-15-4-9------> 11-10-10-17-21-4-11 LU

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:39 am

10-10-10-12-15-4-9-->11-10-10-17-21-4-11 LU/WS/PL/TP

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:51 pm

The_Mentors wrote:

I did get some interesting ones out of the 10 setups, all on different sheets of course.

so for this one i'm not sold on either of my designs and i'm interested in your thoughts, again.

10-10-10-12-15-4-9------>10-10-10-17-21-5-11 WS/LU

10-10-10-12-15-4-9------>10-10-10-17-17-5-15 PR

I like your first design. I think taking the 5 SP over an 11 ST is a very educated decision (not sure if you're a new or a returning manager) based on the RIP skill (especially since the WS learns this poorly it seems; and they dearly need it against their nemeses the SL and LU) and DEF skill. You can burn the ST without burning skills. Either style makes a good choice with this design. If you wanted this could make a very nice PL as well. Heck it probably would make a good "anything but an AB or BA".

I personally don't like the PR class, and it hates me too Laughing

, if I make one I usually like it to have a shot at great damage.

Advanced Expert Poster Joined: Jul 30, 2003 Posts: 115

My thought exactly street why not take the skill at 5 and trn the str. He went in as a PL 10 str 5 sp. I'll trn the str after the thirdish fight. Hoping for the nice first fight learns in the 1st 3. To answer your question I am returning. Im extremely rusty but I remember a few things.

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:38 pm

The roll-up screams Consortium's design IMO. I love rippers as much as anyone, but I would not make that roll-up one.

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:02 pm

I used to love parry riposte in my early years. Either parry riposte and parry strikes. I could never get a parry riposte to survive long enough to get an invite though. That will be my second goal.