Duel2.Com  
•   Home  •  Rules  •  Your Account  •  Forums  • Newsletters  •
Navigate
· Home
· Content
· Encyclopedia
· Forums
· Members List
· Newsletters
· Old Newsletters
· Private Messages
· Setup
· Tourneys
· Your Account
User Info
Welcome, Anonymous
Nickname
Password
(Register)
Membership:
Latest: azawog
New Today: 3
New Yesterday: 3
Overall: 22261

People Online:
Visitors:
Members:
Total: 0
Duel2.Com: Forums

Duel2 :: View topic - Unsure of where to go with these
 Forum FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in

 
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
_Buri_
ArchMaster Poster
ArchMaster Poster


Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Posts: 1040
Location: Asgard

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 2:57 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

c5load wrote:
After a whopping 14.3% winning percentage after 30 some-odd fights, and a total of 8 characters sent to the DA, I figure I'd appeal to the masses on these. Any help at all is appreciated;

1. 10-10-6-17-10-8-9
2. 14-12-8-13-5-13-5
3. 6-13-15-8-12-5-10
4. 4-10-17-6-10-18-5

Thanks!


OK now..
1) 11-11-6-21-15-9-11 ST, PS, PL, LU, SL ... running the risk of little damage, so you might want to go higher ST, like 15 at the expense of WL if you go Striker, such as 15-10-6-21-11-10-11. Come to think of it, just ignore my first design, I like this ST better, it's a winner. Do NOT pass up the 21 WT, whatever you do.
2) 17-12-8-17-9-14-7 BA
3) 11-13-15-11-17-5-11 TP
4) really ugly, just DA it.

_________________
Buri, Crapmaster 2012, Crapgiver 2017
Aesir 003 & 100 & 102, ACME 009, Berk 025, Venture Bros 051 etc.
View user's profileSend private message
Assurnasirbanipal
ArchMaster Poster
ArchMaster Poster


Joined: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 1769
Location: San Jose, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 4:31 am Reply with quoteBack to top

#1 - Buri covered this one well. I would just say that style choice is not as cut and dried as it seems. I see guy as being runnable as most styles (specifically not AB). TP, STK, and L typically give you the best return in terms of win/loss, but nothing wrong with choosing a weak style. Little damage kills most warriors, though.

#2 - It is likely going to be tough to run this except as an offensive. 15-12-8-17-8-13-11 STK is another option from Buri's. I don't absolutely hate 15-13-8-17-7-13-11 TP, but these guys always die on me (though they are fun until they die). Not nearly as good as the first one, but if it learns right, it could do well. Personally I DA guys like this all the time and so do others.

#3 - You've listed him with 69 points, so he has another point somewhere. Once again, Buri seems to have the right idea. I might go 10 str/14 con and raise str/con with stat trains. Could easily see WOS, TP, or L with this guy. For the Lunger, I'd probably make a burner to get more points on him. (Something like 10-13-15-11-19-5-10, raising to 11-15-15-13-21-5-11 L)

#4 - If I was going to run this, I run it as a burner. 7-10-17-6-16-18-10, raising to 8-10-17-7-17-18-11 SL. I probably ONLY run him if he comes back bonused in attack and decise. (Attack will show on the overview, it won't say (He makes bad dueling decisions or He makes costly mistakes). A decise bonus will show if he gets expert decise after raising wit and will once each. Most people won't run low wit offensives, though, so DA is a fine option.
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.10 © 2001 phpBB Group

Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©
:: fisubsilver shadow phpbb2 style by Daz :: PHP-Nuke theme by coldblooded (www.nukemods.com) ::