| Author |
Message |
Den
Advanced Master Poster
Joined: Aug 16, 2003
Posts: 362
Location: Osceola, WI
|
 Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:21 am |
  |
Leaning towards 9-3-9-17-21-10-15 SL as I already have a Lunger on the team.
11-3-9-17-21-10-13 LU would be fun though.
Thoughts from the group? |
|
|
  |
|
The Consortium
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 10140
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:38 am |
|
| Den wrote: |
Leaning towards 9-3-9-17-21-10-15 SL as I already have a Lunger on the team.
11-3-9-17-21-10-13 LU would be fun though.
Thoughts from the group? |
Seems to us anything from this would be fun.
Our normal order from a design like this is:
1. SL
2. ST
3. LU, BA (with QS),
4. PS
probably would not consider any other.
We might give serious consideration to a
8-3-9-20-21-10-13 design.
A good one and a fun one. Good luck. |
_________________
The Consortium: Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014; 1213 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 176K+ fights and 118K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @2085; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1976; Lenpros DM30 @ 1792; Fandils DM46 @1727 |
|
 |
|
One Armed Bandit
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Apr 15, 2004
Posts: 2957
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:40 am |
|
I dislike low CN LUs, so I would shy away from that style.
I would make it either 8-3-9-20-21-10-13 SL or 11-3-9-17-21-10-13 SL, myself. The extra points on DF aren't that helpful to a SL as they have Attack skills in spades. |
|
|
|
|
One Armed Bandit
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Apr 15, 2004
Posts: 2957
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2015 10:47 am |
|
And after reading Consortium's ideas, I like the 11-3-9-17-21-10-13 QS wielding BA as well! |
|
|
|
|
_Buri_
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Posts: 1040
Location: Asgard
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 19, 2015 6:46 pm |
|
| Den wrote: |
Leaning towards 9-3-9-17-21-10-15 SL as I already have a Lunger on the team.
11-3-9-17-21-10-13 LU would be fun though.
Thoughts from the group? |
I like this as a SL, but I'd probably have to go with the 11ST purely for damage purposes. As we all know, all a SL needs is 9 for the SC, but 9-x-9 only has an outside chance at good damage. Even with the 21 WL, it's not worth it to stay at 9 ST and try to raise it to 11. Chances are, if you don't get it on the rollup, raising to 11 won't get it either... but raising to 13, I'd be surprised if it doesn't get good damage by then. |
_________________
Buri, Crapmaster 2012, Crapgiver 2017
Aesir 003 & 100 & 102, ACME 009, Berk 025, Venture Bros 051 etc. |
|
|
|
gentleben
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Round Rock, Tx
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2015 2:18 am |
|
| One Armed Bandit wrote: |
I dislike low CN LUs, so I would shy away from that style.
I would make it either 8-3-9-20-21-10-13 SL or 11-3-9-17-21-10-13 SL, myself. The extra points on DF aren't that helpful to a SL as they have Attack skills in spades. |
Repeat except change the style selection to ST first SL second. Prefer the 20/21 WT/WL version. Give him a rookies run (if not in 20/81) and then train the ST once in his first atena fight. Go with DA or HA in the tourney. Those are my thoughts |
_________________
Gentleben
Ben's Bazaar-21
Caress of Steel-28
Secret Squirrels-32
He Be GBs-33
Time Stallyans-45
Pawn of Prophecy-47
Primal Instinct-81
Misfit Managers-1,2,3,4,18,25,29 |
|
|
|
Otis
Master Poster
Joined: Jul 28, 2002
Posts: 250
Location: Florida
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2015 3:06 am |
|
I would have to be a skill whore and go 11-3-9-17-21-10-13
LU. That skill base looks too nice to pass up. |
_________________
47-Cheers
103- The Mongoloids, etc
Back one of these years with full stables elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Darque
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Jun 21, 2002
Posts: 2527
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:20 am |
|
Den - I'd go with your LU design (11 STR) and make it a SL. Not enough CON for me to make it a LU. |
_________________
Master Darque
Darque Knights -- 10, 20
Darque Forces -- 45, 47
Darque Ages -- 81
Sorcerer Kings -- 83 |
|
 |
|
Manta
Advanced Expert Poster
Joined: Jun 20, 2015
Posts: 194
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2015 1:16 pm |
|
20 wit burner from OAB as striker for me. |
|
|
|
|
Manta
Advanced Expert Poster
Joined: Jun 20, 2015
Posts: 194
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 20, 2015 1:19 pm |
|
Train wit, strength then con. Skills from there. |
|
|
|
|
Den
Advanced Master Poster
Joined: Aug 16, 2003
Posts: 362
Location: Osceola, WI
|
| Posted:
Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:03 pm |
|
Good feedback guys! I went with the 11 ST Slasher, they are a blast to run when they get skilled up, so if he survives it will be a fun ride.
Otis, I agree that Lunger would be a blast as well, and it was hard to pass up, if I didn't already have one on the team it would have been an easy choice. |
|
|
|
|
Spirit
Expert Poster
Joined: May 01, 2013
Posts: 72
Location: St Joseph, MO
|
| Posted:
Tue Jun 23, 2015 3:35 pm |
|
Not that I'm one to help out the AA but I think the 9st slasher would've been good. 9st is all you need for the SC. It should make a great slasher. LU rocks too. I hope it's not in 33 lol
Spirit |
|
|
|
|
Assurnasirbanipal
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 1769
Location: San Jose, CA
|
| Posted:
Wed Jun 24, 2015 9:43 pm |
|
Den, you should have gone 9-3-9-17-21-10-15 TP. 17-21 TP's regularly do very well in challengers and this guy starts with a ton of skills. He would have been awesome. I wish I"d seen this post before you made a decision on him, because surely my grand idea would have swayed you!!!
(Personally, I'd have gone either with the 11 str offensive or 20-21 design, just so you know - My 'advice' was motivated by perhaps other concerns) |
|
|
 |
|
The Consortium
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 10140
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting
|
| Posted:
Thu Jun 25, 2015 12:54 am |
|
| Assurnasirbanipal wrote: |
Den, you should have gone 9-3-9-17-21-10-15 TP. 17-21 TP's regularly do very well in challengers and this guy starts with a ton of skills. He would have been awesome. I wish I"d seen this post before you made a decision on him, because surely my grand idea would have swayed you!!!
(Personally, I'd have gone either with the 11 str offensive or 20-21 design, just so you know - My 'advice' was motivated by perhaps other concerns) |
How very ASS UR like of you, my friend.     |
_________________
The Consortium: Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014; 1213 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 176K+ fights and 118K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @2085; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1976; Lenpros DM30 @ 1792; Fandils DM46 @1727 |
|
|
|
The Consortium
ArchMaster Poster
Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 10140
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting
|
| Posted:
Thu Jun 25, 2015 12:55 am |
|
We forgot to add - "right on!". |
_________________
The Consortium: Crapmaster 2013, Crapgiver 2014; 1213 ADM graduates (40+ manager IDs) including 176K+ fights and 118K+ wins plus 4 teams with 1500+ wins (Animal Farm DM11 @2085; Bulldogs DM11 @ 1976; Lenpros DM30 @ 1792; Fandils DM46 @1727 |
|
|
|
|
|
