DUELMASTERS NEWSLETTER Date : 10/04/2003 Duedate: 10/17/2003 NOBLISH ISLAND ARENA DM-93 TURN-152 This Weeks Top Honors THE DUELMASTER IS TORANS ULRIK MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) (93-7790) [4-0-0,40] Chartered Recognition Leader Unchartered Recognition Leader POSITION IS EMPTY TORANS ULRIK MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) (93-7790) [4-0-0,40] Popularity Leader This Weeks Favorite TORANS ULRIK THE WIDOW MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) LEATHER CHICKS (1239) (93-7790) [4-0-0,40] (93-7179) [1-5-0,8] THE CURRENT TOP TEAM MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) TEAMS ON THE MOVE TOP CAREER HONORS Team Name Point Gain Chartered Team 1. SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) 69 2. LEATHER CHICKS (1239) 36 AVENGERS (287) 3. MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) 1 Unchartered Team 4. THE BLACK GUARD (1299) 0 SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) The Top Teams Career Win-Loss Record W L K % Win-Loss Record Last 3 Turns W L K 1/ 0*SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) 4 1 2 80.0 1/ 2*MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) 10 5 0 2/ 1*MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) 12 8 0 60.0 2/ 0*LEATHER CHICKS (1239) 6 9 0 3- 0*THE BLACK GUARD (1299) 5 11 1 31.3 3/ 0*SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) 4 1 2 4/ 0*LEATHER CHICKS (1239) 9 21 0 30.0 4- 0*THE BLACK GUARD (1299) 0 4 0 '*' Unchartered team '-' Team did not fight this turn (###) Avoid teams by their Team Id ##/## This turn's/Last turn's rank TEAM SPOTLIGHT + ]H[ + ---:--- + ]H[ The Lighthouse ]H[ + ---:--- + ]H[ + Profile of a Team Middle Way 7 Instead of giving you the profile of a graduating warrior this week, I'm going to show you what I started with and what I did to make the Middle Way 7. Warrior #1 I made a parry-riposte, as much because I like making rippers as because I thought this was an "ideal" ripper. (Hint, it is NOT an "ideal" ripper.) 13 + 0 = 13 I left the ST at 13 because that's enough to use any ripper's 5 + 0 = 5 weapon. I didn't raise the CN, though an "ideal" ripper would have 12 + 0 = 12 more, because I didn't have the points to spare. I can raise this 13 + 2 = 15 warrior's CN later, and in fact I did so on the first fight. Why 7 + 6 = 13 didn't I raise the WT to 17 or 19, as I could have done? Again, I 13 + 0 = 13 needed the points more elsewhere, and 15 is sufficient for any of 7 + 6 = 13 the ripper's preferred weapons. Learning with a 15 WT is fine, also. I raised WL to 13, the maximum allowable addition of points, because that is THE most important stat. Without a decent WL, you can't raise any of the other stats, and 13 is marginal anyway. If this warrior survives to graduation, it will go into automatic retirement because of that low WL. SP I left alone because that's more than enough for any ripper to start with. DF I raised by the maximum six points because it's so useful for a) getting initial skills (this warrior was born with an expert in riposte) and b) hitting on target and winning fights before the low CN loses them. This warrior is very frail--mostly the low CN, but incredibly quick (relatively high SP and DF combined). She can't carry much weight, but she does do good damage. Warrior #2 I made a wall of steel, which may be my favorite style. I added 6 + 3 = 9 three to ST because I HATE warriors who do little damage. Also, 10 + 0 = 10 raising ST to 9 will allow this warrior to use the SC, one of my 16 + 0 = 16 favorite weapons. Nothing to CN, 10 is okay. Not great, but okay. 12 + 5 = 17 Five to WT, since I have the points to spend there, gives me 17, 7 + 6 = 13 just about the ideal starting WT. The full six to WL for the same 6 + 0 = 6 reason as above--gotta get it as high as possible, and this is 13 + 0 = 13 still just marginal for a long term warrior. I left the SP at 6, because I never know what to do with SP anyway. And DF left at 13 because the points were needed more urgently elsewhere, and 13 will give this warrior the SC, the wall of steel's best weapon. This warrior came out slightly uncoordinated (the low SP) but at the same time quick on his feet. He can trip faster than anyone you ever saw! Again, can't carry much weight but does good damage. Warrior #3 I made another ripper. Hey, I warned you I'm doing rippers right 9 + 0 = 9 now! It would probably have made a better lunger, but I didn't 8 + 0 = 8 feel like making a lunger, and besides, the idea of a seven-foot 20 + 0 = 20 tall ripper tickled my fancy. I left ST untouched, as 9 will 14 + 3 = 17 give this warrior the SC. CN is acceptable, though low for a 4 + 6 = 10 ripper. Raised WT to 17, because WT is always useful to have; if 4 + 1 = 5 I could have put the two extra points on WL, I'd have settled for 11 + 4 = 15 a WT of 15, though. Six points to WL for the same reason as above --this team is cursed in the WILL department. Oh, well, you work with what you've got. Four added to DF for starting skills and accuracy, and the final one point I dropped on SP because it looked so desperately low. This warrior came out with "slightly uncoordinated" but is not listed as "slow and inactive," possibly thanks to that extra point on SP. At least, that's what I choose to tell myself. This one came out slightly uncoordinated but incredibly quick and active, can't carry much weight but does great damage (the SZ). Warrior #4 has perhaps the best potential, in my view. I made it a wall of 11 + 0 = 11 steel (you're not surprised, are you?). Left ST and CN alone; 9 + 0 = 9 they're high enough to go with. Raised WT to 15, which is a good, 13 + 0 = 13 meaty WT. Why not 16? Because that wouldn't give me anything I 10 + 5 = 15 can't get at 15, and save the extra point for use elsewhere. WL to 12 + 5 = 17 seventeen--gotta love it. If this warrior survives, that 17 WL 5 + 1 = 6 means long-term possibilities in the form of relatively easy stat 10 + 3 = 13 raises later on. One point on SP because I had it and that seemed more useful than any other place I might put it. Three to DF, because the extra accuracy is always useful, though I could have stopped at 11 (the minimum needed to use a SC) and put the other two points elsewhere. If I had chosen to do that, they would probably have gone to ST for more damage. Slightly uncoordinated but active and very quick on his feet, can't carry much weight but does good damage. A familiar pattern, eh? Warrior #5 is a total parry. Somehow he just didn't look like anything else. 4 + 5 = 9 Points to ST to reach my minimum preferred of nine, so that he will 14 + 1 = 15 not be cursed with little damage. After all, he MIGHT strike a 16 + 0 = 16 blow some day. Also, I wanted him to be able to stand up under his 9 + 0 = 9 armor. An extra point to CN, because total parries can always use 12 + 5 = 17 more of that. Nothing on WT, as skills are not important for him, 9 + 0 = 9 and 9 isn't too bad... for a total parry. Five to bring WL to 17; 6 + 3 = 9 this is as important for a total parry as for any other style, and maybe more so, since it affects endurance. Left SP alone; he won't be moving much. Three to DF to bring that up to 9 so that he can use some weapons other than the shields. I have a hard time thinking of shields as weapons, frankly. Normal intelligence--no statement as to how intelligent he is, but then again, no statement that he is "very stupid" either. A compromise I--and he--can live with. He's got good endurance and can take a lot of damage, thanks to CN, SZ, and WL. Can't carry much weight (the low ST) but does great damage (the high SZ). I've already raised his ST by one and plan to up it another point to 11, as I have chosen to arm him with a longspear (they use 'em like quarterstaves for parrying and may, on rare occasions, even attack with them); also, if I am reading the chart correctly, there are no skills to be burned by stat trains from 9 to 11. You'll note that only one of them won its first fight. This is not unusual, nor is it distressing to me. In fact, I like for them to lose their first fight, as it teaches them a little humility! But seriously, the first fight gives you a chance to get the feel of the warrior and decide what adjustments to make to each one's standard strategy. Number 1 was going 6-6-6 straight across, not fast enough to burn out early, not slow enough to scum. She got the first blow, which is good, but I don't expect her to do it again; her opponent should probably be cranking up his Offensive Effort to grab the first blow for himself. She didn't start showing exhaustion statements, so she can handle this speed, at least; it was damage (that low CN) that took her down. The second was going 8-6-6 and did NOT get the first blow, which was appropriate considering his opponent's style. He went down to damage, the wimp, before I could tell if he could sustain this speed. The third, my seven-foot ripper, went 6-6-6 and had no trouble dealing with the Persistent Beggar. I really can't call that a test. The fourth was jumped, knocked down, went desperate, and quit, all in the space of a few seconds. He's going to get some teasing for that from his teammates! He was going 8-6-6, but there wasn't time to see how he liked that. The last one, the total parry, went down to damage, having made no attempt to parry, dummy that he is. I may set him the parry tactic in minute one. He was going 6-6-6, for all the good it did him. If he'd bothered to parry and hung on a little longer, he could have had that fight, because his opponent was staggering with exhaustion in the first minute. Jorja Middle Way 7 +>]H[<+-----+>]H[+ Question of the Week #6 +]H[<+-----+>]H[<+ >From turn 412: AK's Q.O.W. -- There's no single trick to keeping warriors alive. Constitution and armor probably helps the most because it's more difficult for them to run out of hit points and die in the infirmary, plus they don't go desperate as easy which is usually when the death intent comment comes. Warrior experience is a big help, but it takes time to earn, of course. Tourneys could help with this, but you can die there too. It may be at half chance, but you get so many.... It really comes down to the death intent statement usually. Skill, and toughness (including armor) help to keep you from getting to that point, and once there, only warrior experience makes a difference in reducing the chance of failing the survival role after that death intent statement. -- Adie AK's Q.O.W. #2 -- It takes a lot more than three master ratings once you get to the middle ranks of ADM. In the lower end, that could be enough. But success is much more attributed to the sum of the warriors' capabilities. Are they tough? Do they have staying power/endurance? Do they defend well, even with low skills? Do they have good rythyms? Do they 'like' their rythyms? How bout their favorite weapon? Is it good and do they love it or hate it? Sometimes a warrior, for a reason not easily definable, just wins. Other super skilled ones can just lose regularly. Of course, each warrior may win at one level of the game, like basic and as freshmen, but maybe lose like crazy higher up. Godlings will commonly come into their own as champions and freshmen. The very rare few can win ALL the way. Those warriors are a true joy.... -- Adie Another Q.O.W. -- Perhaps it is not the fact that your good roll-ups never get blessed and the others do. But it may be the fact, that you only get few great ones, and it is EASY to remember them not getting gifted. Kind of like that syndrome where people find it easy to remember all the negative things in their life, but find it difficult to point out the equal or more numerous good things. However, if this is not the case, keep those better gifted average roll-ups. Especially those that can win in basic. You may find them winning in ADM later too, especially once they start training stats. Also, if you get enough great roll-ups, you will eventually get gifted ones. Remember, some styles find it easier to be more gifted. -- Adie AK47 -- Let's see... <shuffling through paperwork> It says here that the three recently deceased warriors from my team had 'normal', 'a lot', and 'very frail' hit points. The 'very frail' one died in the infirmary, which is a little different. The hit points, if you will, just determine how much damage can be sustained before the warrior goes desperate/frantic/careless/you-name-it. Once that happens, con ceases to matter. I've seen all types of warriors buy the farm, from 7 will to 21, from no armor to APA/F. You hit upon the most important point, winning as much as possible, but beyond that it's all about luck. Running in a friendly arena can help the statistics of dying, but it doesn't mean any individual is safe and unkillable. Tournies aren't that safe, in my opinion. FEs are helpful, but I think they are just a visible artifact of being a developed fighter. A warrior with a lot of FEs but a lousy learn rate probably isn't much more survivable just due to those FEs. -- Axly AK47 -- Three masters sounds like a good rule of thumb, but that would vary depending on what the warrior's physicals were like. I might say two masters and two ad exes for defensives, but I'm no expert on them. -- Axly Hanibal, QoW -- I have no idea. Some styles get gifted more than others, and in certain areas. If you want the best bonuses, run aimers! -- Axly QOW / AK 47 -- I've found skills keep a warrior alive better than anything. My best learners have all lived. Especially offensives who learn a lot of init and decise quickly. Swing first and keep swinging. I'd take WL over CN for its skills. I fear mentioning this that it may jinx me, but I've never lost a warrior past about 10 fights. Armor has helped me at times, but it robs warriors of much of their finesse. If a good defensive warrior can live through about 5-10 fights and learn well he/she/it should be well on the way to success. -- JRK QOW / AK 47 -- I think it's an oversimplification to say three masters are needed in AD. I also think it depends on the arena. Andorak is very competitive right now. I have warriors with three advanced masters who can't seem to win much anymore. As to what the requirement is... I think it depends on a number of factors, where you are in the rankings, what your favorites are, what you get in the way of challenges, matchups and where your attributes fall. Three masters and tremendous damage/endurance would be much different from three masters and normal in both areas. I'm not sure a good benchmark can be set. But it is certainly and interesting question. -- JRK QOW -- Overall, I would lean toward saying the reverse is true as far as giftedness. Most of my average warriors have come out very close to average, usually a little above. While many of my good warriors have been at least +3, often +5 or more. On my all star team of long ago (Maxwell Honorblade, Monica Virtueshield, Michael Honorblade, Corina Honorblade, and Angela Silverblade) all of my warriors were gifted (four of them by +3 or more, 3 by +5 or more), average or not. I also tend to do well in attack and poorly in init. Giftedness seems to be a fickle thing, I suspect this is because the RUGS are involved. -- JRK P.S. I apologize if it seems I am bragging, but my record and I have never gotten over the graduation of all those warriors. Axly -- Damned if I know. I found the style-linked starting points very curious. Looks to me like there was an attempt to balance styles that resulted in drastic imbalances! -- Leeta Hanibal -- Once you've gotten the death-intent statement, only luck will keep you alive. The thing you need to do is avoid getting the death-intent statement. No, this is serious. You can up a warrior's hit points in the design stage, by adding to CN and, I think WL (but maybe ST), and having a large SZ helps. Of course, if you pile the points on there, he may be dumb and clumsy. You can pile on the armor, which will help keep him alive but may lose him fights unless he can scum; some warriors are totally immobilized by armor. On a more positive note, if I have a warrior who is "very frail" that I really don't want to die, I will use armor, and I will attempt to keep him alive by using the "surrender in desperation" tactic. No, no, it isn't a joke! Honest! Say I've got a frail warrior, probably with normal or lower endurance. I send that boy out running hard, 10-10, even. Sometimes, especially if he's smart and deft, he wins right off. But if he doesn't win right off, he rapidly becomes exhausted and quits. I forget who it was who suggested this to me, years ago--Phido, maybe. It doesn't always work (nothing ALWAYS works), but it may help. And I'd rather have good warriors lose than die; if they stay alive long enough, they build up skills and start winning. -- Leeta P.S. Yes, CN keeps you alive better than WL. WL sometimes leads a low-CN warrior to go on fighting a little too long. P.P.S. Yes, warriors who can take a lot of damage do die, sometimes, because some warriors can dish out a lot of damage. P.P.P.S. The survival of low-CN high skill warriors is more a matter of strategy than anything else. And, obviously, if you don't lose, you don't die. P.P.P.P.S. Picking your arena does contribute to warrior survival, but it can be tricky, since a warrior has, as a normal minimum, a year to go before graduation and the character of an arena may change in the course of a year. Andorian is not always a guarantee of relative safety; you need to look at the actual managers present and evaluate THEM for propensity to run killing styles and strategies. In my opinion, tourneys are of limited value in building up a warrior for the regular arena. Sure, the chance of dying is only half that in regular dueling, but the chance of learning skills or training stats is also only half. And that's what increased FE is about: more skills, more stat trains. P.P.P.P.P.S. There is NO number of fights that will preserve you from being killed, and if you fight equally experienced opponents who happen to be "headhunters," it won't improve your chances much, either! Pick your fights with care, challenge and avoid every time. The only absolute guarantee against death is a potion of immortality (a tourney prize) or graduation. AK47 -- It depends on the advanced arena you're fighting in. And by "hold your own," do you mean have a 50% winning percentage, or rise rapidly through the ranks, or make it to the top, or what? I have run warriors in Lirin Kiv (ADM 107) from the day it opened, and in that arena, no, you don't have to have three masters. Oh, sure, it HELPS, especially now that the arena has aged enough so that some of the foundation warriors DO have those masters. But it happens to be a small advanced arena fed by small basic arenas, and while the competition among the fossils in the upper levels is stiff, the lower levels aren't that bad. Heck, even MY warriors win sometimes! Or, try 101, Home Guard. Yes, the current status lets in warriors who are potentially good, but I doubt anyone there has three masters, and if they do, they're probably on their way out. -- Leeta P.S. And no amount of innate ability on the part of a warrior can overcome for long the effects of careless management. Management may not be ALL, but it's at least half. Hanibal -- Regarding blessed warriors and great rollups, the law of averages says everybody has a chance to be blessed. But it takes a LOT of warriors for the law of averages to operate visibly. I have had great (in stats) warriors who were blessed and the same who were cursed, ditto for average ones. -- Leeta >)]H[(< + -----:----- + >)] The Free Cities #69 [(< + -----:----- + >)]H[(< Zukal: Ghenis watched the ship _Relentless_ ease out into the channel and brushed his hands together. It was bound for Niatoli to further certain interests of the dark cult. On it was Veleks, and Cousin Og, who would look after the small thief...one way or another. Which freed him to attend to other matters. First of those other matters was a meeting with Pelishtekan, the Ferencian who was currently the 'chief priest' of the cult. Ghenis scowled to hide his grimace of disgust. He didn't like the Ferencian. In fact, he loathed the man. But it wasn't necessary to like him, not really. As long as Pelishtekan did his job, nothing else counted. And right now, the man's job was to explain what manner of creature, monster, or whatever was hunting over the lands just north of Zukal. And how the damned thing could be fought and destroyed. It was in the way of certain plans that he had made for the benefit of the dark cult...and of himself, of course. The dark power did not expect his minions to work for nothing but the joy of it. Ghenis left the waterfront behind and wove his way through the twisted and noisome alleys of one of Zukal's poorest districts. The cult always had its centers among the homes of the poor. They were the ones who had something to gain from it, and nothing to lose, from shaking up the old order, after all. Ghenis smiled just a little. He liked shaking things up. The cult was headquartered in a tall narrow building squeezed between other tall narrow buildings. The cellar, which was dark and always damp and divided into tiny rooms no more than six feet square, was used for...storage. More or less. The ground floor, reached by going down half a dozen steps from street level, was the shrine itself. The level above that was where the main work of the cult was done, the plotting and planning, the gathering of information, the good stuff. Above that, two floors of small rooms where members of the cult lived if they couldn't do better for themselves. And on the top floor, the pigeons that carried messages from points as distant as Zuwayza and Murska in the north, Rocanis, Xochithlan, and even Tricorus in the south. Most people had no idea how far the cult reached. Which was another source of amusement to Ghenis. The authorities here in Zukal, the very heart of the cult, had no idea that it was anything more than a handful of dissatisfied commoners meeting to worship some petty godling. Ha! If Bey Sekahos knew how near he stood to the rim of disaster, how fast he was sliding down the slope into hell--! Even the Bandit Princes, who had a clearer understanding of their city, didn't know that the cult was gaining power daily and would soon be ready to make its move. IF the monster north of the city could be dealt with. Ghenis pushed open the door and stepped toward Pelishtekan's office. Near Malcorn: The finger of light slid across the surface of the tall stone and touched the worn carvings, which leaped into sudden clarity. The little clearing, which had been empty except for Lord Malcorn and Tiljanz al Burgos, the young Karnhorn diplomat, was suddenly full of shadows. Or something. Tiljanz could feel the weight of a dozen minds thinking about him--calculating minds, hostile minds, hungry ones. He held himself still and quiet with difficulty. This was Lord Malcorn's meeting; he himself was just present as a witness. Words came out of the darkness, hollow as caves, clear as trumpets. "Why are you here, Malcorn?" "To demand that you enforce your side of the agreement we made, Dregur," the lord of Malcorn replied. If a great tree had spoken, its voice might have sounded like that. "Our side? What have we, the true and original lords of all the land between the lakes, to 'enforce' at the command of an ephemeral like you?" "Do not play games with me. A deal was made and sworn under just such a moon, that the dregur would attack only those who entered this land at the command of the Easterner Inzolas. In return for this, you were released from the Silent Place." "And if we choose now to disregard that 'deal' you speak of?" Idle inquiry. "The Silent Place is still there." "You think you could return us to that captivity?" Scorn and amusement. "You?" "If you do not keep your side of the agreement," now Malcorn's voice was like iron, cold black iron, "I will return you to that captivity. Me." At that moment, Tiljanz did not doubt that Blackie would do just that, whatever the cost to himself. "We did make an oath." The voice was the same, but different. A different dregur speaking, Tiljanz thought. "The oath is a binding already. He could do it." Warning, cool consideration. "Because a few of us have chosen to Hunt freely, as we used to? Unfair! This land was OURS. If we stretch out our hand to take it back, where is the injustice in that?" Passion. "The injustice is in the breaking of our oath. The land itself will reject an oathbreaker. It has always been so." Stern command. "We must keep our part of the bargain, or by our failure we release Lord Malcorn from his. And he could then return us to the Silent Place, if he is willing to pay the price." A pause. "And you can see that he is so willing." Objection. "Those who Hunt alone will not be called back to the kennel, even by you." Unyielding command. "Then I myself will lead a Hunt against them." SPY REPORT Greetings warriors! It is I, Zontani Sharp Eyes, here to bring report of the clash and bustle of the weekly NOBLISH ISLAND games. Former top team TYCRON'S MERCS was unseated this week as MIDDLE WAY 9 moved up from 2nd ranking to take the top spot with a 3-2-0 record for the round. I could not but notice the fine record for SHADOW WARRIORS (4-1-2) after their first round of combat. May the gods of war favor you in NOBLISH ISLAND! SHADOW WALKER caught the eye of many in the gladiatorial commission as she skillfully bested EMBEZZLING SCRIBE and was awarded 21 points in recognition. In one of the week's more notable duels, WIDOWMAKER put down ROMOR SAITH, causing him to lose 13 points of recognition in the process. This time victory fell to the grasp of the usurper. All hail TORANS ULRIK, Duelmaster of NOBLISH ISLAND! Would you believe that over half of the old women in NOBLISH ISLAND seem to feel that they could fight better than you gladiators? But come now, let us look deeper into the maze of contention and crossed blades that is city NOBLISH ISLAND. What warrior does not hone his years, impatiently waiting for the moment of his foe's mortality? Fate is a fickle mistress. She showers the miserable with fortune but sets enemies against the victorious. Remember this! The girls are as pretty in NOBLISH ISLAND as ever I remembered them....and the fighters as ugly! Don't let your reputation slip! Ahh, but I can hear the spires of a far off city calling to me. I must away! Till we meet again, remember: a turtle walks slow, hides head in a shell, and harms no one; a lion runs to slay its prey.-- Zontani Sharp Eyes DUELMASTER W L K POINTS TEAM NAME TORANS ULRIK 7790 4 0 0 40 MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) CHALLENGER INITIATES W L K POINTS TEAM NAME WIDOWMAKER 7180 3 3 0 32 LEATHER CHICKS (1239) INITIATES W L K POINTS TEAM NAME SHADOW KING 7800 1 0 1 21 SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) SHADOW WALKER 7797 1 0 1 21 SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) THE DOMINATRIX 7182 2 4 0 19 LEATHER CHICKS (1239) INITIATES W L K POINTS TEAM NAME THE MISTRESS 7181 2 4 0 19 LEATHER CHICKS (1239) -ZULOK THE SHADOW 7508 3 1 1 17 THE BLACK GUARD (1299) SOUTHERN BELL 7559 1 4 0 16 LEATHER CHICKS (1239) NAEFAN ORDH 7787 3 1 0 14 MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) SHADOW LORD 7799 1 0 0 13 SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) SHADOW MISTRESS 7798 1 0 0 13 SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) ROMOR SAITH 7789 3 1 0 10 MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) THE WIDOW 7179 1 5 0 8 LEATHER CHICKS (1239) LOUIE MURH 7786 1 3 0 8 MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) -LEONIDAS 7507 1 4 0 7 THE BLACK GUARD (1299) -AMASTASIA 7506 1 3 0 6 THE BLACK GUARD (1299) PITRE QUIN 7788 1 3 0 6 MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) -NARYM 7505 0 2 0 2 THE BLACK GUARD (1299) SHADOW QUEEN 7796 0 1 0 1 SHADOW WARRIORS (1346) -BORLORIEN 7509 0 1 0 1 THE BLACK GUARD (1299) '-' denotes a warrior who did not fight this turn. THE DEAD W L K TEAM NAME SLAIN BY TURN Revenge? EMBEZZLING SCRIBE 5 0 1 0 1 SHADOW WALKER 7797 152 NONE EMBEZZLING SCRIBE 5 0 1 0 1 SHADOW KING 7800 152 NONE PERSONAL ADS The Mistress -- (flirting desperately) Excellent moves, fair lady. I am impressed with your, um, attributes. -- Torans Ulrik P.S. (worried look) Did I say that correctly? Flirting is not part of my basic programming. P.P.S. Darn, my aim is awful. I didn't ONCE hit my assigned target. Are you using the dodge tactic in desperation? If not, you might try it. The Dominatrix -- The thing is, you see, I can take it as well as dish it out. Or maybe you can't dish it out. After all, you hit me several times and not ONCE did we see that debated "extra damage" statement...until I hit you. Also, you got tired too fast. Your style needs to pace itself more. Slow down (maybe wear a little heavier armor?) and try to hang on to win in the second minute instead of losing half way through the first (in effect, when you first "appeared winded" and "struggled to hold your fatigued arms at guard"). -- Romor Saith Widowmaker -- (crossly) If you want to make me a widow, you have to attack my HUSBAND, not me. Of course, I'm not married at the moment, but if you really, really want to make me a widow, I'll go out and find some rich old man.... -- Louie Murh P.S. Excellent work on your part. Leonidas -- I advise you to drop the off-hand shield, which you never once used. Reducing the weight you're carrying MIGHT let you dodge my blows a little better. I don't know for sure, but it seems like it's worth trying, don't you think? -- Pitre Quin P.S. At least I learned an attack skill. I need lots of those. I'm told that if I get a bunch, I'll stop flailing around quite so much. Zak -- If that's the only weapon you can use, train your strength. Do it now. -- Naefan Ordh Greetings and Well Come to Ichabod Frothingslosh, who has arrived to save you from the horrors of my uncontested opinions. He's an experienced player and his words are good. I may not agree with all of them, but that doesn't make either one of us wrong. -- Jorja Mae -- Regarding the lazy lunger, is her minute one offensive effort ten? Is she using the decise tactic? Is she lightly or not at all armored (try jumping with heavy armor!)? Is she...fighting the wrong opponents? One of the things that a good manager does, eventually, is start saving up notes about her opponents. Styles, definitely, maybe preferred armor and weapons, anything you can deduce about the opponent's fighting pattern. Then you issue challenges based on that information and who you think you have a reasonable chance to beat. Maybe your lunger needs to be attacking warriors who are consistently slow off the mark. -- Jorja P.S. I realize there isn't much selection here, but once you hit the mainland, there'll be more opponents to pick from. Mae -- Regarding Ichabod's advice to get a chart for weapons, stat requirements, and styles, that does come around in this arena every ten turns. Watch for it and hang onto it. I keep one beside my computer and consult it every time I have to design a new warrior. I just HATE it when I slip and make a warrior who cannot use well any weapon at all, for reasons of insufficient stats and/or style unsuitability. -- Jorja The Saint -- I think Elder Snorri MAY be active in 73, but he may also have changed his manager name. -- Jorja Ah, that would be sneaky.... -- The Saint, keeper of lists Comments on the articles-- Effects of Coordination by Jessie Jest. Jessie is inactive in all arenas at this time. "Coordination has long been ruled to have no effect on a warrior"? This is news to me. I've been playing steadily for the past ten years, and no one ever said that to me. This is one instance where the intuitive response ("Of course it matters!") is the correct one. So his point about the value of coordination is valid. Parry-Riposte, the Best of Both Worlds, by Lord Dauthstorm. I think this manager is currently inactive, and in any case, he's changed his name at least once since writing this, which would make him hard to track down. I don't happen to agree with a lot he says, but that doesn't mean that either one of us is wrong. I've said somewhere, I think in this newsletter, that I've been doing a lot of rippers lately, and the ones that succeed have been varied. Of course, as I said in the previous newsletter, I believe that the current small size of many arenas has had a strong effect on what can be run successfully. A couple of specific points of difference: I would not make a ripper or any other style with a ST of less than 9. I've tried it and I didn't like it. And on the initial rollup, I wouldn't take any stat (except DF for an aimed blow) to 21. These are personal biases, not hard-and-fast "thou shalt nots." The Basic Ripper, by Cadmus. So far as I know, he is currently inactive. I've had good advice from him about rippers in the past, which predisposes me to look with favor on this article. Stimpy's Thoughts on Total Parries, Part II, by Stimpy. This manager is inactive, so far as I know. And no, you did not miss Part I, it has vanished into the past and cannot be recovered. Frankly, I don't like total parries. I always fall asleep during their fights. So I can't give you a helpful opinion on this article. I don't know the style well enough. More Advice for Beginners, by The Arcane Kid. I thought he was active again, but I'm not seeing his team listed in the most recent newsletter from Osksi, so maybe not. He makes some excellent points, particularly in his recognition that a warrior may be good at one level of play and not good at another, and that the warrior should be designed with this in mind. Favorite Weapons, by Abe. He's inactive. And since I have never crunched a number for the purpose of discovering a warrior's favorite weapon, I can't say how effective the system presented here would be. My own interest is to find a weapon the warrior is well suited to (choice made before he ever fights his first fight) and WINS with. Whether it's his favorite or not is beside the point. As Ichabod observed last time, lots of warriors have war flail favorites, but you don't see many flails on the sands. 9 September 2003 WE'RE LOOKING FOR A FEW GOOD MANAGERS! If you think you have what it takes to match wits and blades with some of the best managers in Alastari, then WE WANT YOU! The Tournament Of The Golden Scrod #4 will begin in Aradi (DM 60) the turn after the Fall Mail-In. It's not too late for you to sign up. I realize that many of you may be hesitant after seeing that myself and Hombre have teamed up again, but we'll try to take it easy on you guys a little bit. For more information on T#%S IV, please contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org. We're looking for a few good managers...the few, the proud, the TOGS! -- Ganolus Oakleaf, T#%S IV Commish 15 September 2003 An Announcement Concerning the Brotherhood of the Blade Alliance: I have chosen to withdraw my membership from the Brotherhood of the Blade alliance. The years I have spent in the alliance have been the best of my DM career. I leave the alliance with many great friends and will always remain close to my former brethren. The Brotherhood of the Blade will not skip a beat without my membership. It remains in very capable hands and its roster is among the strongest in the game. With the return on some of its founding members to DM, I know the BOB will continue to grow in strength and prestige in the years to come. -- The Sandman 29 September 2003 All -- Let it be known that the Firm accepts SOL into its ranks. The Firm is: SunGod, Dark Spirit, Youngblood, Tripwire, and SOL. LAST WEEK'S FIGHTS SOUTHERN BELL was devastated by TORANS ULRIK in a 1 minute Challenge Title fight. THE MISTRESS vanquished PERSISTANT BEGGAR in a 1 minute uneven battle. THE DOMINATRIX demolished PITRE QUIN in a 1 minute uneven fight. THE WIDOW was unbelievably bested by NAEFAN ORDH in a popular 3 minute gory contest. WIDOWMAKER demolished ROMOR SAITH in a 1 minute mismatched competition. LOUIE MURH slimly won victory over SHADOW QUEEN in a 4 minute brutal amateur's fight. SHADOW WALKER butchered EMBEZZLING SCRIBE in a 1 minute one-sided competition. SHADOW MISTRESS handily defeated MORDANT DESERTER in a 1 minute uneven melee. SHADOW LORD vanquished CONVICTED THIEF in a 1 minute one-sided duel. SHADOW KING slaughtered EMBEZZLING SCRIBE in a 1 minute gory one-sided duel. BATTLE REPORT MOST POPULAR RECORD DURING THE LAST 10 TURNS |FIGHTING STYLE FIGHTS FIGHTING STYLE W - L - K PERCENT| |WALL OF STEEL 4 PARRY-LUNGE 11 - 4 - 1 73 | |LUNGING ATTACK 3 BASHING ATTACK 13 - 6 - 1 68 | |STRIKING ATTACK 3 LUNGING ATTACK 27 - 15 - 1 64 | |PARRY-RIPOSTE 1 TOTAL PARRY 12 - 7 - 0 63 | |SLASHING ATTACK 1 PARRY-RIPOSTE 10 - 9 - 2 53 | |TOTAL PARRY 1 STRIKING ATTACK 11 - 12 - 1 48 | |PARRY-STRIKE 1 AIMED BLOW 10 - 15 - 0 40 | |BASHING ATTACK 1 SLASHING ATTACK 8 - 13 - 0 38 | |AIMED BLOW 0 WALL OF STEEL 13 - 25 - 0 34 | |PARRY-LUNGE 0 PARRY-STRIKE 4 - 11 - 0 27 | Turn 152 was great if you Not so great if you used The fighting styles of the used the fighting styles: the fighting styles: top eleven warriors are: PARRY-RIPOSTE 1 - 0 AIMED BLOW 0 - 0 3 LUNGING ATTACK LUNGING ATTACK 3 - 0 PARRY-LUNGE 0 - 0 3 WALL OF STEEL SLASHING ATTACK 1 - 0 PARRY-STRIKE 0 - 1 2 STRIKING ATTACK TOTAL PARRY 1 - 0 BASHING ATTACK 0 - 1 1 SLASHING ATTACK STRIKING ATTACK 2 - 1 1 PARRY-RIPOSTE WALL OF STEEL 2 - 2 1 TOTAL PARRY TOP WARRIOR OF EACH STYLE FIGHTING STYLE WARRIOR W L K PNTS TEAM NAME LUNGING ATTACK TORANS ULRIK 7790 4 0 0 40 MIDDLE WAY 9 (1344) Note: Warriors have a winning record and are an Adept or Above. The overall popularity leader is TORANS ULRIK 7790. The most popular warrior this turn was THE WIDOW 7179. The ten other most popular fighters were SHADOW QUEEN 7796, LOUIE MURH 7786, TORANS ULRIK 7790, THE DOMINATRIX 7182, WIDOWMAKER 7180, THE MISTRESS 7181, SHADOW MISTRESS 7798, SHADOW LORD 7799, SHADOW KING 7800, and NAEFAN ORDH 7787. The least popular fighter this week was ROMOR SAITH 7789. The other ten least popular fighters were PITRE QUIN 7788, SOUTHERN BELL 7559, SHADOW WALKER 7797, NAEFAN ORDH 7787, SHADOW KING 7800, SHADOW LORD 7799, SHADOW MISTRESS 7798, THE MISTRESS 7181, WIDOWMAKER 7180, and THE DOMINATRIX 7182. NEW GRADUATES--FROM ALL ARENAS (INCLUDING CLOSED ARENAS) For those of you who keep track of such things, 18 additional warriors graduated from regular DM arenas (including closed arenas) since the last tournament: CAFFEINE JUNKIE (3-6110) ADDICTED CATFISH HUNTER (5-3315) PARTY ANIMALS MATTAHOOPLE (16-4203) GIFTED GODS SWEET JANE (53-6535) THE DARK TEMPLE LIL NOIR (62-3311) ENIGMA NARCISSISTIC NUN (69-8644) ODD SQUAD LEGION '8' (71-2369) D.O.A. RAW SEX APPEAL (82-1331) WHY WE LOVE TUM ZOMBIE STOMP (82-2617) NO MORE TEARS VIOLENT VOLE (82-4565) MAMMAL MILITIA LADY OF THE MOON (82-5481) HARM NONE KAMIKAZI GNAT (82-6073) DEADLY ATTACKS II THE 13TH WARRIOR (82-6346) STOOPID MOVIES SIRTON (82-9190) I AM SUCK DUNE (82-10414) 4-LETTER EPICS FLEM (82-12614) 4-LETTER FLUIDS GREENHOUSE EFFECT (82-12996) GLOBAL WARMING UGLY (82-14501) 4-LETTER DESCRIPTION -- Green Eyes TRICKS OF THE TRADE Here are a few tricks of the trade I've found out. 15, 17, and 21. Those are the magic numbers for stats; any fighter who starts with a stat (except Con and Size) at any of those numbers will have more beginning skills than normal. Stats: The stats in order of importance with regard to skills, most to least, are wit, will, deftness, speed, and strength, with con giving you no skills, just hit points and endurance. The higher you can start any of these, especially the first three, the more skilled your fighter will be. Logically, therefore, what you really want is a fighter who has wit, will, and deftness at 21. This will be a GOD! And probably go out and get killed immediately due to low con... Raising stats: Care must be taken in doing this. All fighters start out with the ability to learn 20 skills in the categories of Defense, Parry, Riposte, Attack, Decisiveness, and Inititive. When you learn all 120 skills, you've maxed out. You can get skills though normal learns, or by raising stats; however, if you raise stats BEFORE you max out (except for Con), anything gained will count as one of the 20. This is called "burning" skills. If, on the other hand, you wait until you've maxed out, then raising stats will add those skills to the ones you've learned, enabling you to exceed your limits. But raising stats will give an immediate boost to your abilities. It's a question of short term vs. long term gain, you see. And aiming at vital areas - head, chest, and abdomen - will increase your chances of getting kills. And being bloodfeuded, and maybe getting your fighter killed in return. Keep in mind that what you send forth will come back to you. Sometimes redoubled. Roku Warrior Handedness, is he a Righty, Lefty or Ambi? Greetings, Joy and Happiness to everyone!!!! I hope everyone that reads this article is doing well and remembering not to drink and duel. This article discusses things about the handedness of a warrior. Most managers only worry about things like skill, weapons and trains. Handedness is not a major factor in playing the game but it's nice to know some things about it. Most warriors will be right handed, with a small percentage left handed. Even more scarce is the ambidextrous warrior. I believe that the defensive styles have a higher percentage chance to be a lefty or an AMBI than offensive styles do. It's just an observation that I made in the 513 warriors surveyed. Another note on that, I notice that out of 211 parry-ripostes that I was using for a PR article, about 43% of them were AMBIs. The highest percent of AMBIs out of all the styles polled. When a manager puts weapons into his warriors hands and also when he tells his warrior where to strike, handedness plays a key role in the manager's decision making. I had a team with 4 AMBIs on it, and I started to do some experiments with them to see how the AMBI thing worked. I noticed that in general the AMBI favors using the left hand more than the right hand. But, there are a small percentage of AMBI warriors that are reversed, where the right hand is used more than the left. There also seems to be some confusion amongst managers that get the USE of a hand mixed up with which hand the weapons go in (IE which is primary and which is off- hand). Right handed warriors USE the RIGHT hand the most and the primary weapon is the RIGHT hand, off hand is the left hand. For left-handed warriors, it is the opposite of right-handed warriors, of course. The confusion comes with the AMBI handed warriors. AMBIs USE the left hand more BUT the RIGHT hand holds the primary weapon, and the left hand holds the off hand weapon. Every so often you will get an AMBI that this is reversed, where the RIGHT hand is USED more and the PRIMARY weapon is held in the LEFT hand. But this kind of ambi is extremely rare. Well, that's it for now. Have fun, and watch out for that right hook... 'cause it might be a left hook!!!!! For more DM info, or just to chat you can DIPLO me at ADM 103, THE JOKER'S WILD. You can also email me at email@example.com or visit my DM web site at the following address: http://ourworld.compuserve.com./homepages/jessiejest/homepage.htm Ta-Ta, Sir Jessie Jest The Arcane Slasher I love the Slashing Style! Slashers are finesse artists, but they're much more aggressive than your aimed-blow. Well-designed slashers are formidable opponents; they are as ready to defend as to attack, though they prefer the latter. Fate has been to kind to this style, perhaps too kind. Even a badly-designed slasher may do well in basic, prompting many well-intentioned managers to promote questionable set- ups as "the slasher ideal." After reading another `Eureka!' article, I am compelled to add my 2 cents. I've learned how to design great slashers, and I'd like to pass on my ideas to the rest of Alastari. I can't tell you how to keep them alive (in four years I've only gotten one to ADM) but I can outline guidelines for creating a spooky character that will win for you--until they die or get to ADM. Just remember that decent opportunities to make a slasher aren't very common! WT, WL, & DF--15 pts each at least. Period. If you don't have it, you don't have a great slasher. Believe me, you can't afford to skimp anything here! ST--Anything from 7-11 is fine. The smaller the character the higher the number, but anything with a +9 size can get by with a 7 ST. For light armor use an epee, for anything heavier use a pair of hatchets, a scimitar, or a broadsword, depending on ST. CN & SP--Ideally, both are single-digit; if your con is high you're probably looking at a WASTE. Whatever else you do, don't add them. SZ--Since this is something we can't change anyway, don't worry about it. The bigger they are the less points to spread around to other areas, though. My slashers come up with the best overviews when I follow these guidelines. Most earn at least four wit statements; about 50% either start out with an Expert or two, or they pick them up within a couple of skills. One of my very best died in a tourney: 6-3-11-15-51-11-17. He started out doing good damage; picked up Experts in att, init, def, and rip. in two skills or less. This is an extreme example, but it seems to me that the well-designed slasher gets more than their fair share of luck on their overview. I've run one a lot worse that did fairly well--a winning record, until he was killed by a veteran lunger: 11-7-14-15-15-7-15, good bases in attack and init, four wit statements, great damage. Running them? Start out with an offensive effort of 10, and never let the OE drop below 7. How quick you taper down depends on the endurance rating. Slashers burn endurance very quickly; if you don't have good endurance drop right away from 10 to 7 and leave it there unless desperate, then go back to 10. Otherwise try 10, then 9, then 7. Remember, these are aggressive beasts; keep 'em on the offensive! Keep the activity level fairly low except in the very beginning, when you should be running 10. Then drop to 5 or 6, then 3 or 4m then 1. Go back up to 7 or 10 in desperation. Match your kill desire to your offensive effort, always. Summary: 10-10-10, 9-5-9*, 7-3-7, 7-1-7 across. Desperation: 10-10-10 or 10-7- 10. Avoid armor unless you MUST, but no higher than ARM and H. Don't use tactics--they seem to inhibit the slasher's ability to riposte and respond well to their opponent. Exception: to take out scum pick the heaviest weapon your character can lift and use the slash tactic--go for the legs or the arms: 7-1-7. Slash all the way! These `rules' have worked for me. The biggest problem I've had is that my slashers rise too high too quickly. Within five or six fights they're fighting warriors with 15 fights' experience. So be forewarned; give them sometime off every few turns so that they won't get clobbered by some old-timer looking for an easy win! Good Luck! The Arcane Kid, of Astral Kin, Osksi DM-3 *Remember, with `good' endurance only! "The Basher" My friends would laugh if they knew I was writing this, but who cares what they think? The basher is not a bad style in my opinion. It starts with the same base decisiveness as the striker, but has 4-5 more skills in initiative, and 3-4 more skills in att. That's what makes this style so good. I mean, you have the ability to get the jump on your opponent, you have the ability to hit your opponent, and who cares about their high riposte with your high att rating combined with your exp+ in initiative, they won't know what train hit them, much less think about the counter attack. O.K. I only make two types 1st the WL Basher: #1 #2 12 13 10 11 10 9 21 16 15 15 9 13 7 7 Example #1--Currently 8-3-1 in Firehold (68) has Master+1 att, Master +1 init., and Adv.Exp. dec., and is already sitting pretty with 80 recognition points. Example #2--Currently 8-3-0 in Jhans (36) has Exp.+3 att, Adv.Exp. init., and Exp+3 dec. with 87 recognition points. O.K., the other kind I like to call it the "High damage, low will, needs to end the fight before he passes out with exhaustion" Basher. This type of basher relies on his high damage capabilities to make up for his low WL. I've not had the best of luck with these types of bashers, but I do know they can win (Warbeast has proved that to me). The key is to get at least great damage on the roll-up. O.K. some examples: #1 #2 #3 11 13 17 11 9 12 16 17 10 17 17 17 7 10 11 11 11 10 11 7 7 Example #1--I DA'ed, he didn't win Example #2--Killed in round 1 of the winter FTF, went 4-3 in the Oct. Tournament, learned 6 skills 5 being Att. Example #3-1-0 in Jhans(36) I run both styles ALE +L, WH light armor, mace medium armor, and WH heavy armor. Go 10-10-7 dec 1st minute, and after min 1, go 8-8-5. WL basher, and the other kind drop down drastically. Always aim for the head (it gets you an att bonus and could score you a kill every now and then) unless you know you're gonna be up against a TP or waste, then aim for a leg. Well that's gonna be it. Somebody write me and tell me what you think. Uncle Charlie Mgr. Genocide (68) Helter Skelter (36, 100) The Anti-Thesis Slasher Greetings all. No, this is definitely not another "Perfect" article. In fact, it actually is just the opposite--finding success with a warrior whose stats were just average. I am not an expert at this game and do not have near the experience that some managers have. What I do have is some now solid experience with Slashers thanks to this guy. So what I will do with this article is show you how my first attempt at building a Slasher went, what it taught me, and maybe I can show a new or old manager something about the style that can help their game. This Slasher was my first attempt at the style. His starting stats were average at 13-11-12-10-16-11-11. Definitely no Primus-quality warrior. By most people's standards, he wouldn't have even been thought of as an ADM warrior because of his low wit and will combo. Today, I don't know if I would even keep this guy, but at the time I didn't know any better and kept him. I'm glad I did because he turned out to be a good warrior, not great, but good and a fun one to watch. He had three statements to start: "...learned how to be decisive and quick", "...conserve his endurance past what might normally be expected", and "does great damage". The last statement I think helped him a lot in many of his fights. Weapons and Armor Weapons-wise, all I knew about the Slashing style at the time was that a scimitar was good, so I gave him one. He did well with it, so I kept using it. I didn't use any off-hand weapon because I knew that an offensive-styled warrior could make quicker attacks with a weapon using two hands. I gave him one back-up scimitar, knowing that scimitars break though not that often. Early on, I may have given him light armor and a helm, but later I discovered that if he didn't get the first hit, he almost had no hope of winning. After all, the credo of an offensive warrior is to "hit first, hit hard" and hope it ends the fight quickly. I also started to realize he would never be a "great" warrior. My philosophy changed and I could only hope to get him to ADM. So, I decided to use no armor or helm, which slows warriors down. Strategy: Ah, the most important part of this warrior's winning ways. Looking back at his early strategy, I wonder how he did so well. I started him going 10-10-10, attack and protect the head with no tactics. My desperation strategy was usually 10-10-5, which did nothing to help him. I used the decisiveness tactic since his overview said he was decisive. Through observing his fights and looking at what he preferred, I ironed out a general strategy which I think is good for a lot of Slashers: min. 1 2 3 4 5 6+ desp OE 10 8 6 4 4 4 5 AL 10 4 2 2 2 2 8 KD 6 8 6 4 4 4 5 AL RA HE -----------------------> PL AM BD -------------------> HE Against more parry-type warriors like WOS and TP's, I've used a 10-6-6 min. One strategy that he seems to like. Design and Trains: I started him off training skills only. But I soon learned that his average stats meant that he wasn't going to learn very well. I decided late to train skills, then stats, every other turn. The training of his will to 17 really helped his endurance out. He finally went to ADM at 15-11-12-12-17-12-11. If I had recognized earlier that he would not be a great warrior, and accepted that, then I might have been about to train everything twice like in the "old" days and he would have gone at 15-13-12-12-18-13-13. Record: He started out great at 4-0-0, then was 8-4-1. He hit a rut and was soon 9-7-1. He was mediocre in his middle fights but was above .500% at 14-12-2. He was under .500% once at 14-15-2. Near the end of his regular DM career, with some careful challenges and strategy changes, he went 5-0-0 and ended up 21-16-2. He was Duelmaster for three turns in Cliffhome. Final Notes: So, what's the purpose of all this? It's to show that anyone can take a mediocre warrior and through careful strategy and design build them into a formidable warrior. I recognized long ago that this Slasher would never be great and accepted it. That's what turned him into the warrior he is today. I was willing to take the risks necessary to make him win. His name is E.G.B.D.F. (Every Good Boy Does Fine) and in this case his name is true. I couldn't have asked more from him in his accomplishments. He can be found fighting occasionally in Darkholm. He's taught me an incredible amount about this style and has contributed to my 65% overall win-loss record with them. I'm open to feedback, positive or negative, and hope in some way that I've helped someone learn more about this style. So, good luck to all and may your swords ring true! Brought to you by Talon, mgr. of Eagles Claw (38,104), Farfignewtons (32) where I'm known as Volksie, and other teams throughout Alastari.